IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HOKEY] REMINDER: WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Tue, 23 August 2011 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361DC21F855F for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3tAM+CnBkSaf for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DEB21F8520 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so5051890gxk.31 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TPh8nV5FVFWYYpcuT9sswkAH6dYw2qbYCEMTS4vDryI=; b=wBj2oeR6GTd+l1KeFMolkYn+o3I6EE1B5EuJWm0OhE25qHSWrqHFjQqtqddkhp8KHg /N3JFnAhmbDfkEBKCAyNGHjyulBED6UWqWlSYtwdi2Le6YmyuZ/wQO279wHZT11JYwWx X2qqopn6qUKoGfHCmok9SyhMeA01Xvlemg9EA=
Received: by 10.101.202.23 with SMTP id e23mr3367215anq.124.1314085032457; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-124-122-183-227.revip2.asianet.co.th [124.122.183.227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm5986999anh.1.2011.08.23.00.37.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E5358A2.7040704@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:37:06 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
References: <4E3A82FB.90400@net-zen.net> <CAPsMJ7rihm_A=YZOw2UBAduiLWBKACNB3Xs6jP-hrGKWi5c38g@mail.gmail.com> <CAProHASND=KEi8Vb17Kmb4fWTK5fR+EE2ZY9N04OkJ4_Gz1SBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAProHASND=KEi8Vb17Kmb4fWTK5fR+EE2ZY9N04OkJ4_Gz1SBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hokey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] REMINDER: WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:36:06 -0000

On 8/23/2011 12:18 PM, Zhen Cao wrote:

> Thank you, Andy, See inline.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:16 PM, andy L <pop.andrew@gmail.com> wrote:
>> first of all, I have read, it is fine.
>> still I have some comments
>> 1 since it is said in Chapter 3 /*This document   only discusses the case of
>> distributing the key to a single CAP.*/ the statement like /*To  avoid the
>> same pre-established Master Session Key (pMSK) being   derived for multiple
>> CAPs, the sequence number MUST be nique for   each CAP.*/ is not so
>> necessary.

Is that true?  The document only discusses deriving the for on CAP _at a
time_; do you really think it's OK for the same key to be used with the
next CAP in a series of moves??

...

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email