Re: [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Miguel,

(cc'ing gen-art to close that loop)

S.

On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
> I did a quick past to the changes that I requested, and I think they are
> successfully implemented in version -08.
>
> /Miguel
>
> On 08/02/2012 13:52, Qin Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Stephen and all:
>> We have just done the update. Diff from previous version:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-08
>>
>> Would you like to go ahead?
>>
>> Regards!
>> -Qin
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stephen Farrell"<[e-mail]>
>> To: "Tina TSOU"<[e-mail]>
>> Cc:<[e-mail]>;<[e-mail]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> IETF LC is ended for this.
>>>
>>> I think the only comment I saw a gen-art review (is
>>> that right?) but that there are changes resulting from
>>> that so I've marked this as revised I-D needed. Please
>>> submit a -08 that includes the changes needed. (I'm not
>>> sure if any of those will require something different
>>> from IANA, but if they do please also respond to IANA's
>>> mail, cc'ing me, if their actions are changed.)
>>>
>>> As soon as we have that I can put this on an IESG
>>> telechat agenda,
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stephen.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/04/2012 07:21 PM, Tina TSOU wrote:
>>>> Good catch. Thank u, Miguel.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 2, 2012, at 7:04 AM, "Stephen
>>>> Farrell"<[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
>>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:51:36 +0100
>>>>> From: Miguel A. Garcia<[e-mail]>
>>>>> To: Zhen Cao<[e-mail]>, Hui Deng<[e-mail]>,
>>>>> [e-mail], Stephen Farrell<[e-mail]>
>>>>> CC: General Area Review Team<[e-mail]>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>>>>> reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the
>>>>> FAQ at
>>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may
>>>>> receive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Document: draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
>>>>> Reviewer: Miguel Garcia<[e-mail]>
>>>>> Review Date: 2011-01-02
>>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2012-02-07
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues,
>>>>> described
>>>>> in the review.
>>>>>
>>>>> Major issues:
>>>>>
>>>>> - None
>>>>>
>>>>> Minor issues:
>>>>>
>>>>> - The main problem I have with this draft is the lack of normative
>>>>> text
>>>>> (RFC 2119 reserved words) in relevant paragraphs. If
>>>>> interoperability is
>>>>> to be granted, an effort should be taken in adding quite a few more
>>>>> normative statements.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, having said that, the section where I find more that there
>>>>> should be more normative text, is Section 3, which is an "Overview"
>>>>> section. In general, an overview section should use descriptive,
>>>>> but not
>>>>> normative text.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, take the last paragraph in Page 5 (that continues to Page
>>>>> 6). One possible change is to make normative the text and move it
>>>>> outside
>>>>> a section whose title is "Overview".
>>>>>
>>>>> Upon receiving the message, the ERP/AAK server MUST first use the
>>>>> keyName indicated in the keyName-NAI to look up the rIK and MUST
>>>>> check the integrity and freshness of the message. Then the ERP/AAK
>>>>> server MUST verify the identity of the peer by checking the username
>>>>> portion of the KeyName-NAI. If any of the checks fail, the server
>>>>> MUST send an early- authentication finish message (EAP-Finish/Re-auth
>>>>> with E-flag set) with the Result flag set to '1'. Next, the server
>>>>> MUST authorize the CAP specified in the CAP-Identifier TLV. In
>>>>> success case, the server MUST derive a pMSK from the pRK for each CAP
>>>>> carried in the the CAP-Identifier field using the sequence number
>>>>> associated with CAP-Identifier as an input to the key derivation.
>>>>> (see d. in the figure 1).
>>>>>
>>>>> Then the ERP/AAK server MUST transport the pMSK to the authorized CAP
>>>>> via AAA Section 7 as described in figure 2 (see e.1,e.2 in the figure
>>>>> 2). Note that key distribution in the figure 2 is one part of step d.
>>>>> in the figure 1.
>>>>>
>>>>> The the last paragraph in Section 3 also contains an "Optionally",
>>>>> which
>>>>> I believe should be replaced with a capitalized "OPTIONAL"
>>>>>
>>>>> Another instance: towards the end of Section 5.2, the text reads:
>>>>>
>>>>> HMAC-SHA256-128 is mandatory to implement and should be enabled in
>>>>> the default configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> and should probably be:
>>>>>
>>>>> HMAC-SHA256-128 is REQUIRED to be implemented and SHOULD be enabled in
>>>>> the default configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Similarly, the last paragraph in Section 5.2 reads:
>>>>>
>>>>> If the EAP-Initiate/Re-auth packet is not supported by the SAP, it is
>>>>> discarded silently.
>>>>>
>>>>> and should probably be:
>>>>>
>>>>> If the EAP-Initiate/Re-auth packet is not supported by the SAP, it
>>>>> SHOULD be discarded silently.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Another topic, Section 9 (IANA Considerations) reads:
>>>>>
>>>>> Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
>>>>> from the "USRK Key Labels" name space with a value:
>>>>>
>>>>> EAP Early-Authentication Root [e-mail]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am missing the sentence to name the master registry where the
>>>>> USRK Key
>>>>> Labels subregistry is stored. This is the Extended Master Session Key
>>>>> (EMSK) Parameters registry (I guess). And probably this comment is
>>>>> also
>>>>> valid for the rest of the IANA actions: the main registry is not
>>>>> named,
>>>>> and it is hard to find it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> /Miguel
>>>>> --
>>>>> Miguel A. Garcia
>>>>> [phone]
>>>>> Ericsson Spain
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> HOKEY mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HOKEY mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>