Re: [HOKEY] Change proposal for ERP-AAK - 7: Leave CAP discovery out of scope
Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Fri, 30 September 2011 03:51 UTC
Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49C221F84A4 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.246, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZYddSrJuTs5 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E30B21F849E for <hokey@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so1719580iab.31 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YX0S0ImspuwLY3O68ZakeHKBJXZpxWYO4lV8e7HdAn8=; b=GmqBdVZt04sEC8C+tARza6xEIi84as0NRyQrQrsyrQ5XZsCjacJeGRpIh9qGZYA9ib Wiara9jlPh/xKPEgnwCSzi/DBrQSiFN7Gb6S+R+62mIZ6ho9qfVG/exTZRNNH5ChiWDu 9mOWAOH+IbW5XMEOQc9KTByBjGOUYR9Xd0tpM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.174.9 with SMTP id t9mr2009320icz.183.1317354859129; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.52.196 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B91C64BA353F4AAAA40BA94292D751E5@china.huawei.com>
References: <B91C64BA353F4AAAA40BA94292D751E5@china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:54:19 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHATzmG0GepXkUJTO7csFaYPOScCGHWmG3=40Yu6sgiQ9ug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hokey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] Change proposal for ERP-AAK - 7: Leave CAP discovery out of scope
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:51:28 -0000
the same, "neighboring" to "candidate" 2011/9/29 Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>: > Hi, > It was discussed and agreed on the list that we should leave CAP discovery > beyond scope of Hokey. > However in the section 5.1, we still have some text to talk about CAP > discovery, I propose to remove > them from the section 5.1 and other relevant sections and also add one > assumption in the section 3 to say > that: > " > > It is assumed that the peer has previously completed full EAP > > authentication and the peer or SAP knows the > > identities of neighboring attachment points > > " > > Regards! > -Qin > _______________________________________________ > HOKEY mailing list > HOKEY@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey > > -- Best regards, Zhen