IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HOKEY] [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-nir-ipsecme-erx-03.txt

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Wed, 09 May 2012 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F019E11E8074 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XEQMchlOfXp6 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EA11E8093 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so9008094pbc.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 08 May 2012 21:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/KG/G9+8FdbaWegQTX93lakpFWueUuWpJhvofAoYkRQ=; b=qMYgWCN1As3R/A7tZo/ZupEfzFdfaaJc4AkYFTeZysdI0euhwbR3JsN81vOnIPhvG8 iBcAkK/G8A9FZqPoeeZvypTLn9v/lCn5lzTtC7OyXBw8OFb+80sxwoyYzNHmcmbhtQj3 WkmTUzBkghR3riG7MAyWQdn/daHP4MoloAIOzrOyJ7Wei9gWzaXHFdCjjcXFI2+pOXWH pBNW7KCcQzsJvKA1bBZsN7ptDOM6QzVSaxVkZ8qwkzi8B75g/6UAg5tjypF17xvrg7Dg bpDY6KMQ7ywbsjuXcBlA7Ynznm/3B8DyuybavZV3tHVuSijIilzRqQlptMdFRpq+Ur9m 6H8w==
Received: by 10.68.197.35 with SMTP id ir3mr4648847pbc.87.1336537288702; Tue, 08 May 2012 21:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-124-120-3-68.revip2.asianet.co.th. [124.120.3.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ka5sm4629302pbb.37.2012.05.08.21.21.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 21:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FA9F0C4.6030400@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:21:24 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120425 Thunderbird/12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
References: <20120412103348.32017.74969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CC5E08B5-9EAC-4EFF-BC24-06F45D6C8A7B@checkpoint.com> <8F2229FE-1995-41F5-AF49-FB5C221C9C85@vpnc.org> <0127FF5E-8F93-4348-B710-3D8924FC5769@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <0127FF5E-8F93-4348-B710-3D8924FC5769@checkpoint.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipsecme@ietf.org, glenzorn@gmail.com, "hokey@ietf.org" <hokey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-nir-ipsecme-erx-03.txt
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 04:21:40 -0000

On 05/03/2012 02:32 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> The response has so far been underwhelming. As I said in my previous message, I'm perfectly willing to go the individual route, but I think this would be a shame. The protocol extension described can have applications in both remote access VPN (opening multiple tunnels with multiple gateways) and in seamless roaming between remote access VPN and local area wireless networks.
>
> I also think that it touches a lot of different areas, and would benefit from the input of people better versed than me in the needs of cellular providers and AAA.
>
> I am CC-ing the HOKEY mailing list (as I should have done earlier) because this draft actually adapts IKE to work with their protocol, and they may be willing to review and contribute, even if this is IPsecME work.

Speaking as Co-Chair of hokey: if there is a God in heaven, the hokey WG 
will shortly cease to exist; therefore, I would strongly recommend that 
anyone who is not a member of ipsecme but wants to work on that draft 
join the ipsecme WG <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>.
>
> So if any of you are interested, and are willing to review, please let us know.

I can work on this.

>
> Yoav&  Qin
>
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>> On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>
>>> We would like this working group to accept this, and have it added to charter. Of course, if it gets accepted, we volunteer to be authors. If it is not accepted, we will try to progress it as an individual submission, but we believe that this changes IKE enough that it should come from the working group.
>>
>> Statements of interest and disinterest on this document are welcome. If you prefer to make such a statement off-list please send it to me or Yaron.
>>
>> A statement of interest that include a promise to review in WG LC count for more than a bare statement of interest.
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email