Re: [HOKEY] [hokey] #7: Discussion of early authentication in section 1 incorrect

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 03:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A0511E8082 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6mQWC2Yo8-i for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E90A21F8C9C for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LS7006XXRFK4V@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for hokey@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:38:08 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LS700AHCRFKCR@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for hokey@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:38:08 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id ADY35995; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:38:07 +0800
Received: from SZXEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.35) by szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:38:03 +0800
Received: from w53375q (10.138.41.130) by szxeml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:38:00 +0800
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:38:00 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.130]
To: hokey@ietf.org, gwz@net-zen.net, henrik@levkowetz.com
Message-id: <255F38D4C569477CAE70FCC91648F4DB@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <058.d484878f7cd9260d597e7462daecd309@trac.tools.ietf.org> <067.074a33490344c029677e901bde9c9358@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] [hokey] #7: Discussion of early authentication in section 1 incorrect
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:35:37 -0000

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "hokey issue tracker" <trac+hokey@gamay.tools.ietf.org>
To: <hokey@ietf.org>rg>; <gwz@net-zen.net>et>; <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] [hokey] #7: Discussion of early authentication in section 1 incorrect


> #7: Discussion of early authentication in section 1 incorrect
> 
> Description changed by henrik@…:
> 
> Old description:
> 
>> From the minutes of the QC session:
>>
>> Change ¡°AAK the client interacts with the AAA to discovery and connect
>> with CAPs¡±.  That¡¯s not quite true.
> 
> New description:
> 
> From the minutes of the QC session:
> 
> Change "AAK the client interacts with the AAA to discovery and connect
> with CAPs".  That's not quite true.

[Qin]: Since  CAP discovery is  out of the scope of hokey, I would suggest to rephrase
this sentence as follows:
"
AAK the AAA interacts with the client to discovery and connect
 with CAPs and the existing trust relationship between SAP and CAP is not needed.
"
Does this make sense?

> 
> --
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
> Reporter:  gwz@…            |       Owner:  hokey@…       
>     Type:  defect           |      Status:  new           
> Priority:  major            |   Milestone:                
> Component:  arch-design      |     Version:                
> Severity:  In WG Last Call  |    Keywords:                
> -----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
> 
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hokey/trac/ticket/7#comment:4>
> hokey <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/hokey/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>