Re: [HOKEY] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design-06.txt
Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D82521F8B25 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5aUHyYTwe9Ik for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95BF21F8B0F for <hokey@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so2338829ywm.31 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fTYciO/XCQtxgNjQAXNDLw8+Wvz5funwi3oaxirsIlw=; b=oUSm1ID3S31vZyG/zyAcE0agO21BPVCLREYiW3Hj2LxFBlxmWU2ywkDjkDc+qTYjBU /bNCr4FCw6sWaMhoW2wlOdfh2PQ9jZVnc3vmhRimKQAgL6w313HSk8ZXnXjwTQ0AQDGm 9bxQ5x9vkco+I0bla7OII+XzFXU0EMsW3r5wQ=
Received: by 10.68.26.169 with SMTP id m9mr15256570pbg.12.1318577880950; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-110-169-236-234.revip5.asianet.co.th. [110.169.236.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4sm17006643pbe.4.2011.10.14.00.37.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E97E6D0.60107@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:37:52 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hokey@ietf.org
References: <20111011074544.10008.63092.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111011074544.10008.63092.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design-06.txt
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:38:02 -0000
I notice that the editor's note in Section 4.1 is gone. It read These probably need refinement. The relationship of pre-authentication to EAP authentication, for instance, is currently not totally correct, when one takes account of the roles described in Section 5. AAK also needs an extension of ER key management. "These" refers to "the major functions comprising the authentication subsystem". The following sections don't seem to have changed, however. Did we decide that the functional description actually don't need refinement while I wasn't paying attention?