Re: [HOKEY] Question about RFC 5296
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 11 July 2011 09:10 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 444CA21F86EE for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.793,
BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JahE-bvCsh8d for
<hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0525D21F8669 for <hokey@ietf.org>;
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id
<0LO500285W2UIY@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for hokey@ietf.org;
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:08:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by
szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8
2006)) with ESMTP id <0LO5002TUW2MWG@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for
hokey@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:08:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml207-edg.china.huawei.com)
([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA FastPath queued)
with ESMTP id ACB23320; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:08:52 +0800 (CST)
Received: from SZXEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.93) by
szxeml207-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:08:51 +0800
Received: from w53375q (10.138.41.76) by szxeml406-hub.china.huawei.com
(10.82.67.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1;
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:08:52 +0800
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:08:52 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.76]
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, hokey@ietf.org
Message-id: <3EC85D2A81594CA8B02BDE270E508430@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <CA3F2D6A.3496%ynir@checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] Question about RFC 5296
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:10:20 -0000
I think it should be 16 hexadecimal octets rather than 128 ocets. We should report this Errata when it is confirmed. Regards! -Qin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@checkpoint.com> To: <hokey@ietf.org> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 3:20 PM Subject: [HOKEY] Question about RFC 5296 Hi This is probably a stupid question, but there's something I don¹t understand in section 5.3.2: keyName-NAI: This is carried in a TLV payload. The Type is 1. The NAI is variable in length, not exceeding 253 octets. The EMSKname is in the username part of the NAI and is encoded in hexadecimal values. The EMSKname is 64 bits in length and so the username portion takes up 128 octets. If EMSKname is 64 bits, why does it take 128 hexadecimal octets to encode it? Either it's 16 hexadecimal octets, or the EMSKname is actually 64 bytes, rather than bits. What am I missing? Yoav _______________________________________________ HOKEY mailing list HOKEY@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
- [HOKEY] Question about RFC 5296 Yoav Nir
- Re: [HOKEY] Question about RFC 5296 Qin Wu