Re: [HOKEY] REMINDER: WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04

Thank you, Andy, See inline.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:16 PM, andy L <pop.andrew@gmail.com> wrote:
> first of all, I have read, it is fine.
> still I have some comments
> 1 since it is said in Chapter 3 /*This document   only discusses the case of
> distributing the key to a single CAP.*/ the statement like /*To  avoid the
> same pre-established Master Session Key (pMSK) being   derived for multiple
> CAPs, the sequence number MUST be nique for   each CAP.*/ is not so
> necessary.

That's correct. We will correct it in the new version.

> 2  draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis specifies some ways to map ERP parameters to
> AAA attributes, such as the keyName-NAI into the User-Name  attribute of
> RADIUS , I think it is worth being recommendated for this draft.

But in ERP-AAK, we do not need to map the keyName-NAI to some AAA attribute.

>
> thanks
>
> Andrew Liu
>
> 2011/8/4 Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
>>
>> At the hokey WG session during IETF 81 last week, the beginning of a
>> three week Working Group Last Call for this document was announced.
>> However, it appears that no-one mentioned this fact on the mailing list
>> :-(, so the Last Call will be extended to 25 August.
>>
>> A URL for this document is
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04.txt.  Please note
>> that the draft is only 15 pages long, including boilerplate, so reading
>> it should not be a major task.  Reply to this message with any comments
>> (including statements such as "I read it and it's fine").  Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOKEY mailing list
>> HOKEY@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Zhen