[HOKEY] Change proposal for ERP-AAK - 1: NAS-Identifier Redefining

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7955921F8CF0 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IZRNmtolPO8Y for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8DE21F8CE0 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LSA00HGO1Z7SC@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for hokey@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:21:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LSA006C51Z0B6@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for hokey@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:21:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id ADZ52886; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:21:06 +0800
Received: from SZXEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.94) by szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:20:57 +0800
Received: from w53375q (10.138.41.130) by szxeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:20:56 +0800
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:20:55 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.130]
To: hokey@ietf.org
Message-id: <95CC197B44CD4AC99B19D541035AA7E3@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_HnIc9IMIhUmmCMg4672Tag)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [HOKEY] Change proposal for ERP-AAK - 1: NAS-Identifier Redefining
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:18:41 -0000

Hi,
As we discussed on the list to draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak, NAS Identifier defined in the section 5.32 of RFC2865
is not appropriate to be used in the inter-realm hanover case. Since CAP(s) and/or SAP are not global identifier
and the value they are choosing may conflict with each other, therefore I propose to redefine NAS-Identifier,
in other words, abandon using NAS-Identifer in the draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-05, instead, replace it with CAP-Identifier
as belows:

"
   CAP-Identifier: This is carried in a TLV

   payload. The type is TBD. This attribute contains a string identifying the Candidate Access Points prior to the

   arrival of the MH at the Candidate Access Network (CAN).It is used by the SAP to advertise the identifier(s) of

   CAP(s) to the peer and EA server.

"

Regards!
-Qin