[HOKEY] Change proposal for ERP-AAK - 7: Leave CAP discovery out of scope
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 29 September 2011 10:18 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 872C821F8CAC for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qVR4b6zen61p for
<hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DF821F8C8A for <hokey@ietf.org>;
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id
<0LSA00A8A4P6AI@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for hokey@ietf.org;
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:19:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by
szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8
2006)) with ESMTP id <0LSA00L664OCA9@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for
hokey@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:19:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by
szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id ADZ59233;
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:19:54 +0800
Received: from SZXEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) by
szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:19:43 +0800
Received: from w53375q (10.138.41.130) by szxeml410-hub.china.huawei.com
(10.82.67.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1;
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:19:43 +0800
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:19:42 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.130]
To: hokey@ietf.org
Message-id: <B91C64BA353F4AAAA40BA94292D751E5@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_qQmxZ45DfMcGMeq/T7ox5Q)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [HOKEY] Change proposal for ERP-AAK - 7: Leave CAP discovery out of
scope
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:18:04 -0000
Hi, It was discussed and agreed on the list that we should leave CAP discovery beyond scope of Hokey. However in the section 5.1, we still have some text to talk about CAP discovery, I propose to remove them from the section 5.1 and other relevant sections and also add one assumption in the section 3 to say that: " It is assumed that the peer has previously completed full EAP authentication and the peer or SAP knows the identities of neighboring attachment points " Regards! -Qin