Re: [HOKEY] New one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR

Stephen Farrell <> Tue, 21 February 2012 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCEF21F881D for <>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:23:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGs4Chu71F+C for <>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3693421F871D for <>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A204F171CFD; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1329844978; bh=f47OV8pSS9ChqI 1d8mF80gi1rQ0+5JcTNQktbWW17OA=; b=XynzuwdJt5wmLkF2Fm1G8bc5+cb4Fs 3iOq/MS5gpSeQrMfPVMKSiG2biX8q4q4x5e1YqEzDlLXcwykr4qCEWO1kVJLRsLE 2yxIYLjXhnol/w0Y7n5wwty4zZlJBlHjVRb2l9vgIwn3kQQBZLC3KJ68ARzkO0Qp k6SKY5Df9k4wADF9SiMyY/Vk1tWdMBd3Wgbl9LxN7QA+qUlXDJmCXjnbQ17PnMIs B0m9dIipKZegAFkQOXTYyd4UH0x1kBKourhq2zLWuxkLl733KTi4XbgGlNGjW7TH OFRfRtAAfi6BQo2vMD6N2wOkTDq+f0tEfirY54gZu43+ZAcV89wKA/Wg==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id eQNjt6ldt6R5; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C95BE171C28; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:52 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:53 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tina TSOU <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] New one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:23:07 -0000


Not about IPR as it happens, but caused by looking at that:-)

I just happened to be looking at this and I've only now
noticed that there is actually no reference for RFC5296
in the body of the document, which I guess isn't quite
right. (Yes, the meta-data is fine, and yes the
abstract says it, but without a reference.)

Sorry not to have spotted this before but I bet that
it'd generate a nit-picking discuss so maybe better
to head that off before we go there.

I'd suggest adding a sentence to end of the introduction
saying something like:

   This document updates RFC 5296. [RFC5296] The main
   changes are foo and bar.

Or maybe something like:

   This document contains a set of minor updates to
   RFC 5296 [RFC5296] based on implementation and
   deployment experience.

Or whatever is actually the case.

And then add the (informative) reference of course!


On 02/18/2012 12:00 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> Dear all,
> This starts a new one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR, which ends at Feb 25, 2012.
> The existing IPR declaration is for 5296.
> I've asked Microsoft, we've not heard back from Microsoft.
> We'll need to get this sorted before this gets approved.
> Best Regards,
> Glen&  Tina
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list