Re: [HOKEY] REMINDER: WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04

andy L <pop.andrew@gmail.com> Tue, 09 August 2011 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <pop.andrew@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE2121F8B0E for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 02:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TWq15F+HpBnk for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 02:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BC021F851F for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 02:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywm21 with SMTP id 21so3638171ywm.31 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 02:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5Bsvsiu8jBE6/1vSCPptbmPIoubs7ell7ZYB6aGUj3Q=; b=Nkuzbeybu3I2OB/k75tTIIc8BbI6+VRfaM1EFoy9292WiARUNZpSUKiEEuPSfgpdFl kW+TgAg5C94v7CvGiKtS5j/XPtH8/FdryRydeGorEznHXwIg4vetzo/z+PIt5M7vKMpi mhJzUzL1lWslJYyOa+XTHKlcpWltzh3ISF/dI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.45.12 with SMTP id x12mr643097anj.3.1312881389088; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 02:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.248.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 02:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E3A82FB.90400@net-zen.net>
References: <4E3A82FB.90400@net-zen.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:16:29 +0800
Message-ID: <CAPsMJ7rihm_A=YZOw2UBAduiLWBKACNB3Xs6jP-hrGKWi5c38g@mail.gmail.com>
From: andy L <pop.andrew@gmail.com>
To: hokey@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed6ca8d4307b04aa0f044b
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] REMINDER: WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:16:02 -0000

first of all, I have read, it is fine.
still I have some comments
1 since it is said in Chapter 3 /*This document   only discusses the case of
distributing the key to a single CAP.*/ the statement like /*To  avoid the
same pre-established Master Session Key (pMSK) being   derived for multiple
CAPs, the sequence number MUST be nique for   each CAP.*/ is not so
necessary.
2  draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis specifies some ways to map ERP parameters to
AAA attributes, such as the keyName-NAI into the User-Name  attribute of
RADIUS , I think it is worth being recommendated for this draft.

thanks

Andrew Liu

2011/8/4 Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>

> At the hokey WG session during IETF 81 last week, the beginning of a
> three week Working Group Last Call for this document was announced.
> However, it appears that no-one mentioned this fact on the mailing list
> :-(, so the Last Call will be extended to 25 August.
>
> A URL for this document is
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04.txt.  Please note
> that the draft is only 15 pages long, including boilerplate, so reading
> it should not be a major task.  Reply to this message with any comments
> (including statements such as "I read it and it's fine").  Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>
>