Re: [HOKEY] WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design

Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Wed, 10 August 2011 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AB611E8078 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.215, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcYbx0fEzTdL for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AAD11E8070 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iye1 with SMTP id 1so321093iye.27 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2Tjd5DfkVJxwUJ9h6SdkNVlNHS8LK3aSWqbhzDHdi68=; b=LMrsZ6fUwJnDiz1kt1Re2yn39bb5km3q/UQJrzKpVsOsN4OAPhRiHMdpQ2XHhwtq64 15uY3lLiUMakvORibixSKR3xsL56T4EECoT+B23nQ0xiqZZm7/zgDyHey0HQqdwsgfm6 uxM6Kkuus3biul+lQhGpBPxhGWXn0k/isx9Oo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.152.68 with SMTP id h4mr4175810icw.265.1312947481375; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.47.198 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E3A81CB.3070106@net-zen.net>
References: <4E3A81CB.3070106@net-zen.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:38:01 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHARuiSdSuNfDf3JWKPOkLxdvQLL2E-RKrbO_YKgjnfaAow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: hokey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:37:32 -0000

I have read the latest (draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design) version of this
draft and think it is ready for publication. However I have some
additional comments to this draft below:
Section 1, It said
"
whereas in AAK the client interacts with the AAA to discover and
connect to CAPs.
"
[Z]: How to understand "discover"? It seems for AAK, there are
potentially two possible cases.
case 1: the client has already discovered a list of CAPs and negotiate
with the AAA to choose one appropriate CAP from the CAPs list.
case 2: the client only knows a layer-2 identifier as index and then
the client use index to lookup appropirate CAP by interacting with the
AAA. which case is correct?

Section 3.1.2 "Minimized User Interaction for authorization"
[Z]: This section seems redundant since the previous section has
already cover this case. Suggest to merge section 3.1.2 into section
3.1.1 or just delete the section 3.1.2.

Section 6:
[Z]:In Quebec meeting, the case where multiple servers are located in
the same domain has been
well discussed. I am thinking if this case should be taken into
account in this section or leave
this case out of scope of hokey architecture?


On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> At the hokey WG session during IETF 81 last week, the beginning of a two
> week Working Group Last Call for this document was announced. However,
> it appears that no-one mentioned this fact on the mailing list :-(, so
> the Last Call will be extended to 18 August. A URL for this document is
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design-04.txt. Please note
> that the draft is only 21 pages long; we read through about half of it
> during the session in about half an hour, so reading it should not be a
> major task. Reply to this message with any comments (including
> statements such as "I read it and it's fine"). Thank you.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOOoHKAAoJEG4XtfZZU7Rf2R8H/RtK8TWkpZkjPmC3ilDKk8x9
> GHa3a8A8Hx2u87VTRo8EerNMue6zE1xVfroRY58UsDidvwIxC7To3ixqq5j0srph
> 2IPoMFVqoxOLlI2XQ2TcFxWoPOcadKyoGn89b6FIrDwgynfuEdYIg1eELv0DOtjo
> n1lt2KKGZaPUG57uHFSEzcGatehGMmKCxKPTfiSwpJTIQFvt4YEHBIWZqj88rJnh
> PPbi4b6DC/4L25t6C0/aeeau+88kJfYpsxjr3cQxvdSmt0690MUftioBHVnJKXaz
> UeM/iw2YQiJk1x6TVMwk6Yvz6/3bSlpBdCFecnvIBhM0RnPRonBpybg7U6KbllA=
> =1Zpm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Zhen