Re: [HOKEY] Comments to draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04

Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 05:18 UTC

Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C078E21F8A51 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.723
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.723 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.474, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxJG6Om8FTlQ for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B7421F8A35 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iye1 with SMTP id 1so474269iye.27 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9uzkVim0Zi3kYROvjm291zt5j0qJjFneZ/ppQZ8ZcMQ=; b=O+CQmqpYpSoi/lz4yLiyi1BApEiTNtZSDev8EgHJnffAabt4WeJ+PQw6rhNHeaWXvq DWrCtL0h4/gvjb2p48SiJoYxiJ64J4mjKThjmk7is3B/YdAHFzHdf1VXE0/JrdvqblTM oStHLCC/QsL++DkGxzBHy44sqwS4SLWKIS7uE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.145.129 with SMTP id f1mr9697343icv.64.1313039963618; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.47.198 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <000001cc57c9$a34bab30$e9e30190$@com>
References: <000001cc57c9$a34bab30$e9e30190$@com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:19:23 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHAS0YtTNh5ef-WuhE6Wp_Wc02NsFVG_gpsY1K0co3yk3ug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: =?GB2312?B?vfC24M6w?= <strobeking@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hokey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] Comments to draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:51 -0000

Hi Duowei,

Thanks for the comments, we will correct them accordingly.

2011/8/11 金多伟 <strobeking@gmail.com>om>:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I have read the draft, and found the technique content are okay, but I found
> the following typos for the authors to correct.
>
>
>
> 1. In abstract, the first paragraph, "a generic framework supporting
> multiple _types_ of authentication methods"
>
>
>
> 2. In Section 4, the second paragraph, it should be "if the peer has _been_
> previously authenticated by means of ERP or ERP/AAK"
>
>
>
> 3.In Section 5.2, the explanation about TVs and TLVs(the first paragraph in
> page 8), it should be “The username part of the NAI is the EMSKname used
> _to_ identify the peer”
>
>
>
> 4. In Section 5.2, the explanation about Cryptosuite (the fourth paragraph
> in page 8), it should be “key lengths and output lengths are either
> indicated or (are) obvious from the cryptosuite name”
>
>
>
> 5. In Section 5.3, the explanation about Cryptosuite (the fifth paragraph in
> page 10), it should be “key lengths and output lengths are either indicated
> or (are) obvious from the cryptosuite name”
>
>
>
> 6. In Section 8, the eighth paragraph, it should be “the peer and the server
> derive the keys independently using parameters known _by_ each entity”
>
>
>
> 7 In section 8, the thirteenth paragraph, it should be “Any domain-specific
> keys are further restricted _to be used_ only in the domain….”
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Duowei Jin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Zhen