IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HOKEY] WG status/WGLCs

<lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com> Thu, 28 July 2011 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D908011E80A1 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.924
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8+IUBIlkas7 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F39111E809A for <hokey@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 602A7FC400E for <hokey@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57961FC400D for <hokey@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:52:52 +0200
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:52:50 +0200
Message-ID: <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F577BB6873@ftrdmel1>
In-reply-to: <4E31E0AF.70605@cs.tcd.ie>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-topic: [HOKEY] WG status/WGLCs
Thread-index: AcxNdJzstNnfaweiR3GUpRHwTepVKwAA9Nfw
References: <4E31E0AF.70605@cs.tcd.ie>
From: <lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com>
To: <hokey@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2011 22:52:52.0165 (UTC) FILETIME=[14C3A750:01CC4D79]
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] WG status/WGLCs
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:52:57 -0000

PS: Note that this is not a situation where anyone in
particular is at fault - the chairs are working hard to
get your input, but it sometimes happens that events
conspire so that interest levels and/or WG participant
availability are not sufficient to justify continuing
as a WG.

[Lionel] Fair statement!
[Lionel] I would just add that the question were about the latest
version of the drafts. It makes a difference... at least for me.
[Lionel] Nevertheless, I totally understand your point. And do my best
during the wglc period... or even before :)

Best Regards,

Lionel
_______________________________________________
HOKEY mailing list
HOKEY@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email