Re: [HOKEY] [hokey] #7: Discussion of early authentication in section 1 incorrect
Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 05:53 UTC
Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5145221F8C3A for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWsdilwltq-w for
<hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com
[209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4309A21F8C39 for
<hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yic13 with SMTP id 13so7184685yic.31 for <hokey@ietf.org>;
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=3554X1W1SQ/LK9KP9hbDnBzGMgOccB3z+6X/gylnnvU=;
b=LAiL8D81e0lW9Fr5niMHafXBTw3MxLF5bDZtdUgI0tROsGWwoIlMTocqPRvyRF1RZX
Y3E5qeKRIF+gUdlk93pLg3tpwc7sHym54vgVTcy5ODheN+Hpp8Uvt5RzYNJDE9HgpT5n
MKk0Ora9Yj0mNosQzHOqmYC9rqDopYkd/5hmk=
Received: by 10.236.76.170 with SMTP id b30mr53854089yhe.32.1317189383327;
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-110-169-254-11.revip5.asianet.co.th.
[110.169.254.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
h20sm85632623ani.16.2011.09.27.22.56.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E82B6FE.9040908@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:56:14 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
References: <058.d484878f7cd9260d597e7462daecd309@trac.tools.ietf.org>
<067.074a33490344c029677e901bde9c9358@trac.tools.ietf.org>
<255F38D4C569477CAE70FCC91648F4DB@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <255F38D4C569477CAE70FCC91648F4DB@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hokey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] [hokey] #7: Discussion of early authentication in section
1 incorrect
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:53:39 -0000
On 9/28/2011 10:38 AM, Qin Wu wrote: ... >> From the minutes of the QC session: >> >> Change "AAK the client interacts with the AAA to discovery and connect >> with CAPs". That's not quite true. > > [Qin]: Since CAP discovery is out of the scope of hokey, I would suggest to rephrase > this sentence as follows: > " > AAK the AAA interacts with the client to discovery and connect > with CAPs and the existing trust relationship between SAP and CAP is not needed. > " > Does this make sense? One problem seems to be that the term "client" is not really well-defined here. My guess is that it means either "peer" (in the EAP sense) or "mobile node", but neither of those have any awareness of or direct interaction with AAA. ...