IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HOKEY] WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design

andy L <pop.andrew@gmail.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 07:28 UTC

Return-Path: <pop.andrew@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D2B21F85F7 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iXZJhTVjgj7Y for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D95321F85F1 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1355545gxk.31 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4QTAs+1w2vcqIGJ2tRi3ovOSXN6tjpW85SgWfK+hMfY=; b=B0aceTJzhOHlJ0AhWepNViORdpthVsrbygOwWKESUlvZYgLw8H/kU1/IuoqbwXo6wh vuFwHKxsS+jrXMj9Se740sph+F26CRjVMAK+IH7Dxdcg220fLnt6D30Tj60HV8efVjme 4xyH7ZkfNAqpDNTIWTju8RUnz86qS4V0ATonY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.47.1 with SMTP id z1mr8083653anj.135.1313047755419; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.248.9 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E3A81CB.3070106@net-zen.net>
References: <4E3A81CB.3070106@net-zen.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:29:15 +0800
Message-ID: <CAPsMJ7p++QTdMZ5e4pRRR8HKRUcr_dB-OLyVQAwtLEJg9YNsdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: andy L <pop.andrew@gmail.com>
To: hokey@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed6c3508f15a04aa35c143
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-arch-design
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:28:43 -0000

please check section 5.4 and section 9, I have one question.
as we know, re-auth message has SEQ field, is a new TV for sequence number
still required?

andrew liu

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email