Re: [HOKEY] [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-nir-ipsecme-erx-03.txt

Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com> Wed, 09 May 2012 01:55 UTC

Return-Path: <cuiyang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE2321F84D9; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.943
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.943 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wtLIN-kCXpMW; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9DF21F84D8; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFR02754; Tue, 08 May 2012 21:55:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:52:42 -0700
Received: from SZXEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) by dfweml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:52:45 -0700
Received: from SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.215]) by szxeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.137]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:52:40 +0800
From: Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-nir-ipsecme-erx-03.txt
Thread-Index: Ac0omlSaYyDp9av3SUeV57mXxGXUuwE61JdA
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 01:52:39 +0000
Message-ID: <8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE2161F4876FC@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <20120412103348.32017.74969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CC5E08B5-9EAC-4EFF-BC24-06F45D6C8A7B@checkpoint.com> <8F2229FE-1995-41F5-AF49-FB5C221C9C85@vpnc.org> <0127FF5E-8F93-4348-B710-3D8924FC5769@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <0127FF5E-8F93-4348-B710-3D8924FC5769@checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.48.93]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "hokey@ietf.org" <hokey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-nir-ipsecme-erx-03.txt
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 01:55:35 -0000

Hi, all

> So if any of you are interested, and are willing to review, please let us know.
I would like to review this draft.

Cheers,
Yang
==================
 Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
 Huawei Technologies
 cuiyang@huawei.com


> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Yoav
> Nir
> 发送时间: 2012年5月3日 3:33
> 收件人: IPsecme WG
> 抄送: hokey@ietf.org
> 主题: Re: [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-nir-ipsecme-erx-03.txt
> 
> Hi again.
> 
> The response has so far been underwhelming. As I said in my previous
> message, I'm perfectly willing to go the individual route, but I think this would
> be a shame. The protocol extension described can have applications in both
> remote access VPN (opening multiple tunnels with multiple gateways) and in
> seamless roaming between remote access VPN and local area wireless
> networks.
> 
> I also think that it touches a lot of different areas, and would benefit from
> the input of people better versed than me in the needs of cellular providers
> and AAA.
> 
> I am CC-ing the HOKEY mailing list (as I should have done earlier) because this
> draft actually adapts IKE to work with their protocol, and they may be willing
> to review and contribute, even if this is IPsecME work.
> 
> So if any of you are interested, and are willing to review, please let us know.
> 
> Yoav & Qin
> 
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
> > On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> >
> >> We would like this working group to accept this, and have it added to
> charter. Of course, if it gets accepted, we volunteer to be authors. If it is not
> accepted, we will try to progress it as an individual submission, but we
> believe that this changes IKE enough that it should come from the working
> group.
> >
> >
> > Statements of interest and disinterest on this document are welcome. If
> you prefer to make such a statement off-list please send it to me or Yaron.
> >
> > A statement of interest that include a promise to review in WG LC count for
> more than a bare statement of interest.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec