Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

<erik.taraldsen@telenor.com> Thu, 30 June 2011 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <erik.taraldsen@telenor.com>
X-Original-To: homegate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homegate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E730811E8071; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ww3vXRkces1; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sv04.e.nsc.no (vip1scan.telenor.net [148.123.15.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A99A21F85AD; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tns-fbu-22-248.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.162.18] [134.47.162.18]) by sv04.nsc.no with ESMTPS id BT-MMP-729675; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:51:33 +0200
Received: from TNS-FBU-2E-016.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.163.219]) by tns-fbu-22-248.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.162.18]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:51:32 +0200
From: <erik.taraldsen@telenor.com>
To: <swmike@swm.pp.se>, <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:51:30 +0200
Thread-Topic: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
Thread-Index: Acw25FkjU7sz+zclSF65n2H2+JtplAAR9c+Q
Message-ID: <6A141C5EC2D26E47B3128814D5F69592156010B7D9@TNS-FBU-2E-016.corp.telenor.no>
References: <4E0AE696.4020603@piuha.net> <4E0BDCF3.1090003@gont.com.ar> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106300707370.19581@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106300707370.19581@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: nb-NO
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: nb-NO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: homegate@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
X-BeenThere: homegate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <homegate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homegate>
List-Post: <mailto:homegate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:51:37 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: homegate-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:homegate-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: 30. juni 2011 07:12
To: Fernando Gont
Cc: homegate@ietf.org; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Fernando Gont wrote:

> This is exactly why the whole "system" needs to work, including uPNP like 
> functionality for nodes to talk to the firewall(s).

UPnP like can indeed be UPnP.  The UPnP Forum has defined IPv6 firewall control as a part of UPnP now.
http://upnp.org/specs/gw/UPnP-gw-WANIPv6FirewallControl-v1-Service.pdf

Telenor, which I work for, is going to ask for this as a part of the IPv6 offering from our CPE vendors.


-Erik Taraldsen