Re: [homegate] Proposed Charter Update - 2010/09/09

["David Harrington" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Initial can be individual, adopted later.
Arch doc can morph while the WG decides on scope and priorities, and
finish after recharter.
I don't see a problem.

Maybe we have different assumptions about the contents of the arch
doc.
Home networks take many forms, so I don't see one stable architecture.
If the WG reaches consensus on home network arch contents and finishes
earlier than I anticipate, that's fine.

Ray raised a point - is the arch doc about home network design, or is
it a framework that describes how various technologies (the seven
bullets) fit together?

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:13 PM
> To: David Harrington
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [homegate] Proposed Charter Update - 2010/09/09
> 
> OK, that all makes sense. I did not understand that the 
> purpose of the many drafts on many topics was to help the 
> rechartering effort. However, we still have some issues. The 
> current proposal is:
> 
> >Goals and Milestones:
> >---------------------
> >
> >Nov 2010 - Initial revision of a Home Network Architecture 
> document Mar 
> >2011 - Adopt a Home Network Architecture document as a WG 
> item Mar 2011 
> >- Individual drafts as WG candidates for Routed home 
> requirements Mar 
> >2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for Simple naming 
> >requirements Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for 
> >Multi-homing requirements Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG 
> candidates 
> >for QoS requirements Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG 
> candidates for 
> >Security requirements Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG 
> candidates for 
> >DNSSEC requirements Jul 2011 - Recharter the working group 
> Dec 2011 - 
> >Submission of the Home Network Architecture document to the IESG
> 
> Given what you said, I do not understand the first two and last
line.
> 
> - Why would the WG not adopt the early version of the Home 
> Network Architecture document?
> 
> - Why would the IESG want the WG to recharter when the WG 
> still hasn't agreed on the contents of the Home Network 
> Architecture document?
> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium