IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homegate] Update on BOF / WG formation

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Sat, 25 September 2010 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC553A69B5 for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 13:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYeoLQAlyenQ for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 13:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B14A3A69EE for <homegate@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 13:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,236,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="594815836"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2010 20:41:20 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-222.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-222.cisco.com [10.32.244.222]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8PKfKSZ022989; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:41:20 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C9C831D.2050307@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 13:41:19 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <EDD9C09E-1069-4ADB-B5AB-E6CEBB91DA78@cisco.com>
References: <2BD6ED58-174E-451F-BA22-0C824629FBB7@nominet.org.uk> <4C9C831D.2050307@cisco.com>
To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: homegate@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homegate] Update on BOF / WG formation
X-BeenThere: homegate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <homegate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homegate>
List-Post: <mailto:homegate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:40:46 -0000

On Sep 24, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Mark Townsley wrote:
> My personal view is that this is directing the group towards maximum
> overlap with the existing forums and standards bodies in this area
> (including IETF's on v6ops*), and not the direction Ray and I wanted to
> try and lead the group based on the feedback we were hearing from you.
>  [snip]
> * "BCP Work" for IPv6 home networking is covered within the newly
> proposed v6ops charter:
> 
> ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/fred/v6ops/v6ops-new-charter-00.txt
> 
> "4. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs that identify and analyze
> solutions for deploying IPv6 within common network environments,
> such as ISP Networks, Enterprise Networks, Unmanaged Networks
> (Home/Small Office), and Cellular Networks."

FYI, that paragraph is unchanged from the previous charter.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email