IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2011 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homegate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homegate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7BA21F8785; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZVw7mMVe2n-B; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6DE21F8783; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so1121525wwe.13 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=10KdA6BB7YTziXhvMqyGI62wfRhWPh8GL5XxYDwUtnY=; b=uQh/OqMyQg0zYDHG/JBiMWUvHJLdiUJclSuVpMkuXYkKMhqNvIy5WqxUZEPGKphNJX tb3BNyVstVFgTkcLLPzTCyhmN6IFJV9rl00gNA+31DE/y7LsOeZv4EH27l4iV/3CFOBs dIZj8eAGAC/lVzrZpNlecqjYBfCN7hCiEfvwY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.55.136 with SMTP id u8mr966304wbg.99.1310111161085; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.142.137 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E0BE5FF.3000409@gont.com.ar>
References: <4E0AE696.4020603@piuha.net> <4E0BDCF3.1090003@gont.com.ar> <BANLkTinuPcq2r85kzMctFCHDB3Ta=WgA4A@mail.gmail.com> <4E0BE5FF.3000409@gont.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:46:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SF6yZK4wW==yK+7g+OzFnOFxGHT=FW-bXzYPOtxMWrF5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:07:55 -0700
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "homegate@ietf.org" <homegate@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
X-BeenThere: homegate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <homegate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homegate>
List-Post: <mailto:homegate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:46:04 -0000

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 11:38 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
>> The opportunity for restoring e2e is one of the great opportunities of
>> ipv6
>
> This assumes that e2e reachability is a desired property for all networks.

A very good point, there are a few network that break e2e on purpose.
But I guess this mostly affect enterprises and not the general
Internet part, and still I would guess that the network on the
"inside" for those enterprises still use e2e quite heavily so it's
still relevant.



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           |
rogerj@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger@jorgensen.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email