Re: [homegate] Update on BOF / WG formation

"Stephen [kiwin] PALM" <palm@broadcom.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <palm@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homegate@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BC13A6923 for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mdkp80Ary-c for <homegate@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mms1.broadcom.com (mms1.broadcom.com [216.31.210.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8353A69C8 for <homegate@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.9.200.133] by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:42:27 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: 02CED230-5797-4B57-9875-D5D2FEE4708A
Received: from mail-irva-12.broadcom.com (10.11.16.101) by IRVEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.9.200.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.247.2; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:43:44 -0700
Received: from [10.9.253.29] (dhcp-10-9-253-29.broadcom.com [10.9.253.29]) by mail-irva-12.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA55069CA8; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C9CB8D2.8040105@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:42:26 -0700
From: "Stephen [kiwin] PALM" <palm@broadcom.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
References: <2BD6ED58-174E-451F-BA22-0C824629FBB7@nominet.org.uk> <4C9C831D.2050307@cisco.com> <85403065-B886-421E-9CAF-C98BB6031E7F@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <85403065-B886-421E-9CAF-C98BB6031E7F@nominet.org.uk>
X-WSS-ID: 608267594785447093-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "homegate@ietf.org" <homegate@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homegate] Update on BOF / WG formation
X-BeenThere: homegate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Broadband Home Gateway Discussion <homegate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homegate>
List-Post: <mailto:homegate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate>, <mailto:homegate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:42:04 -0000

I also had questioned some of the aims of the proposed group when other groups
were doing most, if not all, of the same things (albeit wearing different hats)

On 9/24/2010 4:30 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
>
>> I think the question on the table now is whether it is worthwhile to
>> charter homenet for just this type of work or not. I tend to think the
>> answer to that is no, but I want to hear from the list first.
>
> For the avoidance of doubt, that is my position too.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homegate mailing list
> homegate@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate
>

-- 
Stephen [kiwin] Palm   Ph.D.                          E:  palm@kiwin.com
Senior Technical Director                             T: +1-949-926-PALM
Broadcom Broadband Communications Group               F: +1-949-926-7256
Irvine, California                               W: http://www.kiwin.com
Secondary email accounts:  stephenpalm@alumni.uci.edu  palm@broadcom.com
s.palm@ieee.org  palm@itu.ch  spalm@cs.cmu.edu  palm@ics.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp