Re: [homegate] Update on BOF / WG formation

Hi,

I think Ole's proposal is a good one. 
Having drafts should help to identify just what work you want to do in
homenet.

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: homegate-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:homegate-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ray Bellis
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 10:53 AM
> To: homegate@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [homegate] Update on BOF / WG formation
> 
> 
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 14:15, Ole Troan wrote:
> > 
> > I think that's a good idea.
> > - let's see individual drafts, preferably with -homenet- in the 
> > filename
> > - continue to use this mailing list for discussion
> > - cancel the homenet BOF slot in Beijing.
> > - reconsider the need for a wg at a later juncture.
> 
> Considering the feedback received, this would seem to be the 
> best option from here.
> 
> Unless we hear strong arguments to the contrary soon, Mark 
> and I intend to ask the IESG to remove the group's 
> provisional slot from the IETF79 schedule.
> 
> This will happen this evening, as today is the final 
> scheduling cutoff.
> 
> Ray and Mark
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homegate mailing list
> homegate@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homegate
> 