Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com> Fri, 17 October 2014 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8951B1ACD3D for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eosjzXcJbU8L for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0148.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E911ACD3F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0676.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.152) by BN1PR0201MB0690.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1054.13; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:26:52 +0000
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.150) by BN1PR0201MB0676.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1054.13; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:26:51 +0000
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.169.150]) by BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.169.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1054.004; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:26:51 +0000
From: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
Thread-Index: AQHP54K0vE/OjWpAb0mPoL0zPh7VxpwvPjQAgABcm4CAAAw3AIAAA/SAgAAE6gCAAAu7QYAACxgAgAF83QCAAAhcgIAABAaAgAAK/oCAAAILAIAAFRCAgAAMRwCAAAZXgIAAEfyAgAAu6ACAAAJQgIAAAmWAgADtGgCAAAVLgIAAAqeAgAAGWoCAAACjgIAAAL6AgAACIoCAAWmFkA==
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:26:51 +0000
Message-ID: <ce786e8c245e4be4a5347af2efa728c3@BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com> <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net> <4E2E154E-D231-4E79-860A-56948A13CDD4@fugue.com> <20141015154841.GY31092@Space.Net> <CBC8A3D9-9EBD-47FF-B066-247898FF2000@fugue.com> <543EA248.2080700@mtcc.com> <CB50B30B-DC36-4354-96B7-19AE415BD03F@fugue.com> <543EBE40.3030201@mtcc.com> <BA5ABBFA-9D13-4975-A96C-530FE958322A@fugue.com> <543ED2A7.3090409@mtcc.com> <1569644A-50C4-47B6-908E-262BC62BCD14@fugue.com> <543EFBF1.6040101@mtcc.com> <457D177C-232E-4590-A9ED-80048140157F@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1kix0HxWsC4n7ta4EG-6YhMMdYCTnFFXGb2ATQBbkMHA@mail.gmail.com> <DCB62D43-DFD3-4985-8FAA-896CEA3BD342@fugue.com> <BE969E9B-99C0-415C-804F-80149C416EA8@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr3kJQetKzgYyZ1vpxKT31=wiNavxTM+WoUTg2gP5Dx4LQ@mail.gmail.com> <94C19398-AC5A-416F-8C3E-EA6B1750C22C@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1rpFeZuy=nXFSj+dpa749RhJJ2j9+U=cmFq_4cCsC_4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1rpFeZuy=nXFSj+dpa749RhJJ2j9+U=cmFq_4cCsC_4g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [95.172.74.68]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0676;UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0367A50BB1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(199003)(377454003)(24454002)(189002)(93886004)(50986999)(4396001)(80022003)(85852003)(86362001)(92566001)(76576001)(15975445006)(19580395003)(16236675004)(85306004)(77096002)(54356999)(15202345003)(46102003)(108616004)(74316001)(87936001)(2656002)(76176999)(19580405001)(40100003)(19625215002)(101416001)(97736003)(95666004)(99286002)(122556002)(76482002)(99396003)(120916001)(33646002)(20776003)(21056001)(105586002)(106116001)(66066001)(31966008)(107046002)(19300405004)(64706001)(106356001)(276003)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0676; H:BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ce786e8c245e4be4a5347af2efa728c3BN1PR0201MB0674namprd02_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0690;
X-OriginatorOrg: technicolor.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/02znx-ITJj5MJ7GP3z5Pw_FHJDM
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:26:55 -0000

Correct.

DHCPv6 has its own state machine, so I would say, taking into account the 2hr valid lifetime minimum, to just make sure to have a leasetime short enough to cope with these changes rather than start enforcing the glueing of RA and DHCPv6.
OK, shorter lease time will introduce some more traffic, but imho, not that big overhead and only local traffic



From: homenet [mailto:homenet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Colitti
Sent: donderdag 16 oktober 2014 16:19
To: Ted Lemon
Cc: homenet@ietf.org; Michael Thomas
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> wrote:
On Oct 16, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com>> wrote:
> Um, no? Why would it?

Because that's an indication that there is new information to be had.

So every time a new prefix comes in, hosts should restart DHCPv6? That seems pretty dubious (and expensive). I don't think any DHCP implementation works that way.