Re: [homenet] Looking for a Homenet co-chair

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 27 August 2021 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9A03A2E6B for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 04:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUw2OgHR5vIy for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 04:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (minerva.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2a01:7e00::3d:b000]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274553A2E68 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 04:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (bras-base-otwaon0812w-grc-41-70-26-81-181.dsl.bell.ca [70.26.81.181]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC221F449; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 11:05:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 2A8E71A0304; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 07:05:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
to: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <28851.1630003107@localhost>
References: <7757492A-8374-4D54-849D-B669FB54CF03@cisco.com> <84a5802e-bd82-f24b-bf4b-cf6c0fe1d08b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAPt1N1=Pw+K-aQGrxFnwUkpyz8YJF5FBqVP-HX0oAMYsSYVxxA@mail.gmail.com> <28851.1630003107@localhost>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> message dated "Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:38:27 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 07:05:04 -0400
Message-ID: <843107.1630062304@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/0IEXV4lOPGLJy1GCGlcEZtD2WMU>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Looking for a Homenet co-chair
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 11:05:16 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    >> progress the stub networks draft because I've been too busy doing
    >> dnssd work, but that would be an example. I'd really like to progress
    >> that draft /somewhere/, and it seems a /bit/ off-topic for dnssd. It
    >> could go in v6ops, but it's pretty off-topic for v6ops. Same with
    >> intarea.

    >> But of course the stub networks document isn't what Homenet set out to
    >> do.  It's just a building block that might lead there. The original
    >> work of homenet doesn't seem to have caught on in the market, and I
    >> think it's because we didn't have an adoption strategy. Personally I
    >> think stub networks is a good bottom-up beginning to a strategy that
    >> could ultimately produce an adoptable version of what we originally
    >> tried to do. But again, only if people here want to pursue that.

    > I thought that you *wanted* to go to INTAREA with this document.  I
    > agree that it's an important document.

If we need to keep HOMENET open to do stub networks, then let's do that.