Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 15 October 2014 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670851A8F49 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9UgnQ2gQcJ6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56761A1AB2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from takifugu.mtcc.com (takifugu.mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s9FIYeDu008064 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:34:41 -0700
Message-ID: <543EBE40.3030201@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:34:40 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: homenet@ietf.org
References: <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com> <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net> <4E2E154E-D231-4E79-860A-56948A13CDD4@fugue.com> <20141015154841.GY31092@Space.Net> <CBC8A3D9-9EBD-47FF-B066-247898FF2000@fugue.com> <543EA248.2080700@mtcc.com> <CB50B30B-DC36-4354-96B7-19AE415BD03F@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB50B30B-DC36-4354-96B7-19AE415BD03F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/1HF1krXTxb0Pn8xIfIPGpirYhTo
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:34:42 -0000

On 10/15/2014 10:50 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
>> What about when my device is wandering back and forth between my ap and my neighbor's?
> I don't think that's a problem that we're scoped to solve, unless your and your neighbors' homenets are a single homenet, in which case life is good.
>
>

I'm just pushing back that ULA's aren't necessarily without problems. 
It's easy to see how they
can cause weird connectivity breaks across administrative domains. 
Though it's obviously not
just homenets, wandering back and forth between neighboring networks is 
probably more likely
with homenets, IMO.

Mike