Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 17 October 2014 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0091A01AA for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.394
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.394 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jo6aAw1ppfD9 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D5321A0172 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id rd18so886033iec.29 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=orStnjVHfbgqFlBe7IhtIZSE6IIUr5ifqc1oGPCMdYg=; b=AbsiTRFm+XN3hl+2VoQKMiHt3v84ZTE1JYKY2qAph51+GPU227O7awsom7xb2rTdVU EGWlIkUyHniW3rRtwhVnOnKpT9uPGLFEfEVIOtlgf60MKih0ep/7tNEOsGl8f2FBHv2i TIQBZVzl3kBKl+x+Mdo82H2QBOfYGL+5vQQ1HoaOvhAE+UKo4Fw4oogJEcEjWyt7TLh6 ParGGW0XBDgnutiJNYUxBBL6V66zY7Kr9vfOmhRDCjh2MvIsARJ5019evS4vwDZBAUkO LbS9adt5CP6VXRcpSGd/EmDLzyGkmh4M0TU3pcOYv0tIdA5LIDawRGEYzffs7UhRtPKs vEEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=orStnjVHfbgqFlBe7IhtIZSE6IIUr5ifqc1oGPCMdYg=; b=Cwt9y+SO5tauot5O/IXeLv4KmBDz61T2q5sxv8v7xnx8d41wvZ4ZSwOtERZLiPdgvL 3E8IHfa5HNnNNAL1nZmFWfLxNhiyQc1lBF1dRsXo+aPEwZI2Kft16fbsXZHxHegpHJmM 6YYHD7OBky2IEuF1z9oOkbXQvV1OOcLmqwRdb575dbr78Bss3JWG76mPodLos6Wqj7Cg mrWcEyYEwfXdrdxL7tTi6adig/cIPHqN7e121pal0BmJB4LS4issil+SZY6P5Cg84tC4 JvJz3L8xACcJ/DyMduAdESbu86rwjLmPfuOKbYrbpTlKtJlCRHWBSEnCHq2yjz/c68hZ uMLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkoKqukdH9K02VZYfCJLdbP7F40kWT57BJR71fIs+Mk7EAnr/uVHsYykeN/PNmXkM0T1Kjr
X-Received: by 10.42.25.204 with SMTP id b12mr10792499icc.14.1413557425773; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.8.242 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8352C2EF-A888-4279-BFFF-37E204A0E2D3@fugue.com>
References: <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com> <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net> <4E2E154E-D231-4E79-860A-56948A13CDD4@fugue.com> <20141015154841.GY31092@Space.Net> <CBC8A3D9-9EBD-47FF-B066-247898FF2000@fugue.com> <543EA248.2080700@mtcc.com> <CB50B30B-DC36-4354-96B7-19AE415BD03F@fugue.com> <543EBE40.3030201@mtcc.com> <BA5ABBFA-9D13-4975-A96C-530FE958322A@fugue.com> <543ED2A7.3090409@mtcc.com> <1569644A-50C4-47B6-908E-262BC62BCD14@fugue.com> <543EFBF1.6040101@mtcc.com> <457D177C-232E-4590-A9ED-80048140157F@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1kix0HxWsC4n7ta4EG-6YhMMdYCTnFFXGb2ATQBbkMHA@mail.gmail.com> <DCB62D43-DFD3-4985-8FAA-896CEA3BD342@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1rpFeZuy=nXFSj+dpa749RhJJ2j9+U=cmFq_4cCsC_4g@mail.gmail.com> <4D6F2B13-D63E-4FEE-A136-B510126CC1C9@fugue.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130EA3B9A@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <1AA5DBBD-C3C5-4AFD-A043-6A69AE7FBDB9@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr3Fa7hgXZReWFgmHA9pLnH=ezHLXh-aAdA-_N=AR3AiyA@mail.gmail.com> <3F36952F-CF6A-4F21-A713-A8A7DE7BDC42@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr3eP+8qs8uMzrfOmebp+bihGed7PjWi0=8+cV4N6Dx=ww@mail.gmail.com> <8352C2EF-A888-4279-BFFF-37E204A0E2D3@fugue.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:50:05 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0J=zAk_XvgigjJiLTbMoT-SOWTewf0-C+om79P+FNvKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f6dfc3be32705059f7c14
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/1cfFTiNIAl5SxEWvuoEdnwHVgcQ
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:50:28 -0000

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> I think that we should design our protocols to work independent of what
> prognostications we are able to make about what users might do today,
> rather than making decisions that will ensure that certain perfectly valid
> uses of the network will fail tomorrow.
>

But you're saying you want ULAs because you want to continue to do what you
were doing yesterday: persistent connections, like SSH and X-windows. I
think you're trying to fix the problem at the wrong layer. But I don't
expect we'll agree with me on that.