Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B3E12D1E7 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HmMkfjBfPKS6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B909712D0C3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j8so55771561lfd.2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xtAnqmZxDHYzDyFazMhV+pY6AKuBPfc7nuRcOQLB5EI=; b=JHehaIxsm5LBjvjW+A7m19D/pfAHaCKCflCd4zQEEC4oLLJOwuX1ODS9dzqTghV0up GAChCFg0ibhYB5ibi0pNe34+CO2xk6Rt9RuqJebb/LX3w2zkn8w0WwXqTPYpZFT6KUEt MEqJaW9NhDO8BCQpQNSFux0lU111eyBU90hKaoBbCkokv9WEQ5lZEdY3wTqNT/Hadm6c pJ+qmr+1WPDJoO/f1SbqeoHuiTz4dtn9oVwzej+I0wqTYiESSG5otVG/uP+kvgCV6+bC JlZKdDLGtfJVJv5YYBh8+M+wVYDCKAuX234ooVoqP3YT1nSJqiPnvUz1GVHPSmjKVuCV 3yrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xtAnqmZxDHYzDyFazMhV+pY6AKuBPfc7nuRcOQLB5EI=; b=QKtpnc9zrp2h29WfmIGQqU+SjNqrrNKbx2Fuixpwgjkr8aVJlD+Y9vD83wJV8DRbBR J1soDN2dolTPKfZCAiR8FmQnRjpQd4pHqgHcH+1qHhdQpc5lrMkht7/aSwgO3496X8uK 4+N9q17p7uGmm1KNSwquK2j9xJdb+yC3QlfwOTug584GyGKyCqhjnbErg3JgXdYU5jWa iMQCCZ3SGAxdqdAfmcnk1YxnKX3DPGKffc07rWwp9A/olpYl1psIRJBl/VzC0SDfMRUC D238bxb4MrKDKwfvGpj51kwCbjamol77uQqpXVv9jJnw9fPKEe8dJKSWqoYQZTCz2u0Q ZrlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUBt+VczSHsYP7UptXg0vyrUOTdoYa7MQYqmAeuwCQwJ5ee9Uc2TF+HncC0ORnJEFTlc0FMGHcsL5fzcQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.161.41 with SMTP id xp9mr2009348lbb.133.1462985447019; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87k2j0h789.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <6E709688-414A-4AFB-AEAE-56BAE0469583@coote.org> <87oa93vz8e.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <917CFE11-2386-4B0D-8A81-F87764AC09A4@coote.org> <87lh47vtpe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <02CF43FB-CF81-4C0C-84E1-A8DFB27B3F8C@coote.org> <87lh44fff7.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <48A9C52C-85BC-4123-A3ED-FB269AD03126@iki.fi> <87eg9wfctc.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nq1CTMmQHFQXnaFY73SyRPKpWagiMVfrHODakbeT2Wxw@mail.gmail.com> <87a8kj3r7p.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nN+ih8xpBV_-T_JaGtbBG6d5zYqW==tph8yN_UB34NNw@mail.gmail.com> <56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|87dc38b1e390496e02166dafe2490d8as44D0U03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <57333B3F.7000009@globis.net> <CC759790-4F9B-47B8-A42C-A85F78AC9773@jisc.ac.uk> <57335AB6.8060305@globis.net> <87mvnwh81u.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nu98pXdDzVgZ2yW7xe8mwA=O+zmoGS8XLs_NLbNUaKFQ@mail.gmail.com> <87k2j0h789.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:50:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1n_-XrLtqm_sKGqaHPw1q4pgKyir-bvv=cbwE_vgHDPMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c26b2ae1b1d1053293d7de
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/1o6u7v9YozLyEcS5fvwYbZ9WAj0>
Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "Ray Hunter \(v6ops\)" <v6ops@globis.net>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 16:50:50 -0000

I tend to think of routing protocols and election protocols as
"intelligent", but perhaps you meant something different... :)

E.g., did you mean "stateful?"

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <
jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>; wrote:

> >>> Proxying flies in the face of the trend of smart devices and dumb
> >>> networks.
>
> > Be that as it may, Homenet in general flies in the face of that trend.
>
> Not sure.  If you look at HNCP, the only intelligence there is a bunch of
> election algorithms (prefix assignment is just election with non-local
> constraints, all the rest are just instances of two standard election
> algorithms).
>
> It's not as bad as it looks ;-)
>
> -- Juliusz
>