IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] primary / secondary configuration

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 18 June 2019 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F265120258 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRNdnYMjVQde for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A750C1201ED for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id p144so8734548qke.11 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=8C1ZTwM17D98mOtpX7POE8XWCZVr1l7OC+tu0DtmwWM=; b=IODGEwstV7FEPd+by6Fv9jBzkQqX/kTpigd+W0CqYP+WJJjDvRAnrqi91m1URRxXjq 7gn6qYpVoe1G7gB+EnWJbot/mSMAXR/Sqambrn/8snVrpXS6u7xyyEjGby88GTkUbLT7 PjvSZ6YjBfnBkTdH3pRX4AX30fvYcybO7uCEyRrD//nsuwnrvB9kzBwzTGK0jB377Sso hlWODZ3CbDPPGfXjvDW2B21pzyilP61V+Ucb+hRWks75Gt5HWWjjTaXZPawflNoGqUjx ARKQLieVRDZCKzSKe48sPCKjcglwO5wKQT+GvNBmf2AHSlht5Rpn2R47W7z8s/qhfJty xO+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=8C1ZTwM17D98mOtpX7POE8XWCZVr1l7OC+tu0DtmwWM=; b=g129uM9Jtj1O399k6lFx6tyHGC1mb+kmVX4uHW8mYo4mFthEllOXRNN26shbwaUGy4 Qk9/8crZkPtEaEZ1WwpiXas0T92gFJQbNpPSoZFESmpPqzCTQMtwED9yYFghua/OOZcs V6v2WDbEnkicow814M9xnE6o6P9Od2QUNEwzkBeZwbNlk0pasIX839IGzMzMtbog4zoz OJIyH1wVdSrn3VGet1m+3WFoIifaV00+lUoZdwdxHRSXBkqnjkFp4yiVsdF+h/lBpyyJ IVRpsCQpnES57Qkk9k0HAdoS9EaBG4oxrTHq0NReRAhimanDwylbEbtNvu/SgaciJYQW VAMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWaR+ambS9AtVJIHifIZIo0cENk55iGlnymtBogjyrkGJNG8w2 HdOg0qxCGZNzU+4SBBrar6hZPg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4y1FGHK1LCR0xQAmcO4C+HUhysNmecxNxOUQm3mhXSXcZ7fbT9TDFZ9B+G56tjjiJHw0NQg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:687:: with SMTP id f7mr39055083qkh.238.1560870244824; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:c1a2:1:c806:4a3a:3f15:b80b? ([2001:470:c1a2:1:c806:4a3a:3f15:b80b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 32sm7380513qta.91.2019.06.18.08.04.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <A79ABAFA-9114-4C5F-92B9-72E1BA7BDD87@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_33704F22-1EE7-412C-9CFA-9ADF3B4F31AB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:03:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTknZNOa9asX49DGbxKFpd1gkgHAkSxyeyH77zOfd__O=eg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>, homenet <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
References: <CADZyTknGV8huQzVrQcJgFu82HGkOhBe9Q2f23bBXYT8-WOjtPg@mail.gmail.com> <07b0d046-1a1e-7019-49df-46a9470eab48@globis.net> <CADZyTknZNOa9asX49DGbxKFpd1gkgHAkSxyeyH77zOfd__O=eg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/2JKV1NZ9Ujpp_MRpN2ceAkuKYCg>
Subject: Re: [homenet] primary / secondary configuration
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:04:10 -0000

On Jun 18, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> wrote:
> I am also questioning on whether we should provide some sort of recommendations for the UI. While we are not UI designers, I believe some properties could be interesting for designers, and those may be helpful to be provided. 

The trouble that we have gotten into repeatedly in this working group is that we write the specification in anticipation of an implementation, rather than on the basis of experience doing an implementation.   We have a fantastic testbed for this: OpenWRT.   I am at this point somewhat expert in doing OpenWRT builds.   Rather than speculating about what we need to say, why not do an implementation, see how it works, and then do a writeup based on what we learned?   We’re already talking about doing this at the Hackathon.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email