Re: [homenet] homenet-prefix-assignment update - prefix length 64 and on prefix comparison

"Townsley.net" <mark@townsley.net> Thu, 16 October 2014 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBF71A1AEC for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_igFfTSI8_s for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A32DE1A1A66 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l18so3877584wgh.5 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=RFJ97pLpPS4964ORjMHfmumiCj2Kr0FnJOFCzpYlXw4=; b=YVwq+HWi0HVFQsdG74orEHeVHn+kLON15hCCkd2bKOz0YW/c93SNDnVGoLQvUF67O2 M7OsWxjr/qgWvmggCImHmu/RqGC7AezPXloMhoNSF4m0bN1ldAhEYTW7PoctFXIocduH o0uARQHzaRpsx3L9VU5KHaNVaY69zJ5AH6HBGimGQE3kE/wR06UIVwxE2A2Qq/ydFeZi B0nGZa66JrGZNCn+fJaVrdY1kHUvDSjQh2aZtH8cihILHTY885rN7uhgiY39/NZCgDtS g7wM7WSjWyr+VVpFYzty8VuThD5OdWZAyrkuinv4j4gQKOWQbkFVd7GHJ556EKzxy454 3+HQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXGHugsomScUX5Gl1xBXzjpgEi/VPD8NrYEzjoVT88y+O5qItqhtrsXtbKvkeZ5/3vVTOJ
X-Received: by 10.180.73.244 with SMTP id o20mr6607976wiv.9.1413469669198; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [100.100.19.14] (135.16.90.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.90.16.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hr10sm2195816wib.9.2014.10.16.07.27.45 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
References: <A0C73AEC-6D0F-498B-9BDD-D6AF91202CCB@darou.fr> <54350D62.5050706@gmail.com> <048F40EB-A1D5-4D70-986B-9DDE55FF7C22@darou.fr> <FAFE72E2-04EC-4B27-BE1F-6E2F9F7F7A1C@employees.org> <37213B35-CAE1-4AF7-B94D-2B5EAD1C4A39@darou.fr> <5308B561-200A-455C-B2E9-4B4824ED2A1D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|2f5d8f14bb6cf818659db375e4a75ba0q97FLf03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5308B561-200A-455C-B2E9-4B4824ED2A1D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <5435D845.9030108@gmail.com> <AE46801C-D3EA-436A-9894-CCF9B9E46A5D@townsley.net> <A50A4BEF-B267-4BFF-8DDE-297D03A16DBC@darou.fr> <0D6BC65B-CD29-4C90-8787-365C79542DDC@employees.org> <C6EA0921-F56B-4F5B-AF22-75D90496D93F@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0bf2a71c0149ccab46ab7b399538a486q98KN403tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C6EA0921-F56B-4F5B-AF22-75D90496D93F@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <842E6585-18FF-4286-8C6F-C683500D47FC@townsley.net> <3D635F2F-15E1-45A7-869C-ACF82FDC60BF@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9352c23cc277187742eb1ddba396a3aaq99FSb03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|3D635F2F-15E1-45A7-869C-ACF82FDC60BF@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|9352c23cc277187742eb1ddba396a3aaq99FSb03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|3D635F2F-15E1-45A7-869C-ACF82FDC60BF@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-6A913918-E646-40B8-95B0-EEA1AA9BAC08"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <142FE72F-8FD9-4CCA-AA02-F8A35CFBCB42@townsley.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A405)
From: "Townsley.net" <mark@townsley.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:27:40 +0200
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/3Fm2bNTa1aypFxZlYQAaG84j9Gg
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet-prefix-assignment update - prefix length 64 and on prefix comparison
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:27:56 -0000




> On Oct 10, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 13:43, Townsley.net <mark@townsley.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>> On Oct 9, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 9 Oct 2014, at 12:03, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> it doesn't make sense to specify something that breaks SLAAC.
>>>> 
>>>> protocol design is politics. we want to make it clear to the address delegation authorities that not delegating a large enough address block will lead to breakage.
>>>> 
>>>> in my view, if we let this principle slide, then the risk isn't that the delegations are /80s, but that they will be /128s. and you're back to IPv6 NAT anyhow.
>>> 
>>> So - provocative question - should this draft be Experimental in status instead if it’s diving below /64 boundary?
>> 
>> No. I think you are putting way too much weight on an informational document here.
> 
> Hmmm.. the draft says it’s intended status is Standards Track, not Informational?  Just a typo?

I was referring to the why64 document.

- Mark 

> 
> Network Working Group                                         P. Pfister
> Internet-Draft                                               B. Paterson
> Intended status: Standards Track                           Cisco Systems
> Expires: March 23, 2015                                         J. Arkko
>                                                                 Ericsson
>                                                       September 19, 2014
> 
> Tim