Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 14 October 2014 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14F61A8A88 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.088
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KMTZAE4ODQKP for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5031A8A80 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C024C3C; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:38:01 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date :date:in-reply-to:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1413304680; bh=C+lRj1Ts5fvbU3qx08LZjmIQ1IIa3cI4uJVPOb118Go=; b=c iVGLIjyAqXZdGzVQbwAnL9Rr1HX703Vdfg91hXZLxQFLEo8uDjmFz1ENhKD5+qP5 3EBunizxTL0ZM+GjtADYSwz0JPGOiLH2ooH6ZcR36qwnzs1aUlg1S2gsZzopp9TH 4VNtreGDP11hMT9XJAWUFsgDrmHhBti4fLAm7pzCaA=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id T+Ljfz39OYKf; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:38:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:8640:1::f1ed:8dbb:2dc0:f63b] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:8640:1:0:f1ed:8dbb:2dc0:f63b]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFE873A; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:37:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <6231BC6A-CF83-4B5A-835A-D7B8BEDDC3AC@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:37:59 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9695FA43-9CFC-4DE2-960A-1B3D0B61B5EF@steffann.nl>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <7D59D80C-2BF0-428B-A872-B2922B2D0F98@fugue.com> <20141014154606.GA31092@Space.Net> <D3B4E4A6-8CEB-4590-A457-44F939A7E939@steffann.nl> <6231BC6A-CF83-4B5A-835A-D7B8BEDDC3AC@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/3KqIyEdU30_JxC5IJadBFHN3oyg
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>, =?utf-8?Q?Gert_D=C3=B6ring?= <gert@space.net>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:38:03 -0000

Hi,

> Op 14 okt. 2014, om 18:27 heeft Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> On Oct 14, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
>> One thing that does worry me is every application developer having to re-invent the code for all of this (find labels, actually implement the networking code correctly etc). I think a standard API should be available for all of this. Otherwise all operating system vendors and distributions will come up with something completely different which will make it even harder for the application developers to do the right thing.
> 
> It would be helpful if you could participate in the MIF working group, which is working on solving this problem.

Will do :)
Sander