Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8EA1ACE96 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvBnW8e2CVp0 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1DB1A1ADF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id fp1so2266492pdb.39 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uedTA3F4Oh36BxmAKXmzFd9LhBb4vy14oyHuc5LMZjk=; b=o96KtRPlcSh97QDxNQQdzvg6XL0TK1vBMKBOzQObJc9zCljb7HRH0/du+pZcVi+XiT UCGwyD/VISMriavg/jIK18hPY4T+6ZBYQIEIpaXrWfm6368JNpmJAWY+Ud+K1UsuPCIW Wh0Kels2L6TAZmqk5bskc4yETLHkKeUGfj/EyEMkC98AUIuIzE3ySjIrWttfxcFhnuMb yKlXOIyDnJ0840XtbW0aribLAV8wU2/Z45OfyLuUwBm+Ves1OW6mIQpzr53SyHrYsfG5 tu5peVkdITVkmL4Hv24sLQtRXedKLq2PlnBsmzdah7lppQQL6qhdj20+mgQjNSGgFzdS nY8g==
X-Received: by 10.66.251.194 with SMTP id zm2mr16616096pac.33.1413423590293; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.1.55] (219-89-120-188.adsl.xtra.co.nz. [219.89.120.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qx4sm18231583pbc.14.2014.10.15.18.39.46 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <543F21E7.5050005@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:39:51 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
References: <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com> <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net> <4E2E154E-D231-4E79-860A-56948A13CDD4@fugue.com> <20141015154841.GY31092@Space.Net> <CBC8A3D9-9EBD-47FF-B066-247898FF2000@fugue.com> <543EA248.2080700@mtcc.com> <CB50B30B-DC36-4354-96B7-19AE415BD03F@fugue.com> <543EBE40.3030201@mtcc.com> <BA5ABBFA-9D13-4975-A96C-530FE958322A@fugue.com> <543ED2A7.3090409@mtcc.com> <1569644A-50C4-47B6-908E-262BC62BCD14@fugue.com> <543EFBF1.6040101@mtcc.com>
In-Reply-To: <543EFBF1.6040101@mtcc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/3ec8nxFTOd-UexspPzRHudMPOQc
Cc: homenet@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:39:51 -0000

On 16/10/2014 11:57, Michael Thomas wrote:
> 
> On 10/15/14, 3:49 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On Oct 15, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
>>> See, I don't find that ideal at all. If I'm swinging around on my
>>> backyard trapeze watching
>>> the flying wallendas instructional video from my home jukebox, I
>>> really don't want to have
>>> my network break connectivity because I happened to switch to my
>>> neighbor's wifi and I
>>> was using a ULA when I could have kept connectivity with a GUA.
>> This is simply a non-sequitur.   It has nothing to do with homenet.  
>> It has to do with how the stack works on your home, and what the
>> propagation of radio waves looks like in your back yard.   The
>> assumption that you will be able to access your jukebox over your
>> neighbor's wifi contains packed in it so much new protocol work we
>> could fork several working groups to handle it.
> If I use a GUA to my jukebox, the routing will just work regardless of
> which
> AP I'm currently connected to. With ULA's, not so much. That's hardly a
> non-sequitur.
> 
> ULA's with mobility are very problematic IMO. I'm a lot more likely to
> wander onto my
> neighbor's home network than to suffer a flash renumbering from one of
> my providers.
> Mobility considerations aren't a distant future, they're now.

Sure, but that is *exactly* why you might want your personal
printer or your personal porn server or whatever to have an
address that can never be accessible from your neighbour's
yard. (Yes, I know that isn't "Security" with a big S but actually
it's part of a secure environment.)

    Brian