Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203431A894D for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yX3ek6I6A2Q8 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24261A8949 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0675.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.151) by BN1PR0201MB0723.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1049.19; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:39:32 +0000
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.150) by BN1PR0201MB0675.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1049.19; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:39:30 +0000
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.169.150]) by BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.169.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1049.012; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:39:30 +0000
From: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
Thread-Index: AQHP54K0vE/OjWpAb0mPoL0zPh7VxpwvuDwAgAACwrA=
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:39:29 +0000
Message-ID: <a664d66850b04b4ea196666e2ccad794@BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <5620.1413300562@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5620.1413300562@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [188.188.67.163]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0675;UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 03648EFF89
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(24454002)(199003)(13464003)(108616004)(40100003)(19580395003)(33646002)(99396003)(85306004)(107046002)(105586002)(21056001)(77096002)(4396001)(31966008)(95666004)(120916001)(2656002)(106116001)(106356001)(97736003)(122556002)(87936001)(19580405001)(80022003)(92566001)(86362001)(46102003)(20776003)(85852003)(101416001)(66066001)(76482002)(64706001)(74316001)(54356999)(76176999)(99286002)(76576001)(50986999)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0675; H:BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0723;
X-OriginatorOrg: technicolor.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/6av-HRKA2n7BBsMsyHlFk5Iq_FA
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:39:35 -0000

No:
The IPv6 CE router SHOULD be capable of generating a ULA
           prefix [RFC4193].

SHOULD, not MUST

-----Original Message-----
From: homenet [mailto:homenet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2014 17:29
To: Pierre Pfister
Cc: HOMENET Working Group
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?


Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr> wrote:
    > The architecture document states the following: - A home network
    > running IPv6 should deploy ULAs alongside its globally unique
    > prefix(es) to allow stable communication between devices [...]

Doesn't RFC7084 (6204) already say this?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-