Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 17 September 2019 13:34 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48B8120846 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nX999G5Rtozd for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 253EF120099 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id y144so3985893qkb.7 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=2IO6FaKKU5JWVUJgXFC4ZKdFJbya1lL0RBo5le0KBFQ=; b=K70qs1vgilnlnC9CB/E83EyfKNWEYL6ON90i65QdRlBRcZbEiaB7Ng7a9En/wv/173 LtXio0FZuXJryEZuK6JwFhvrRVF6vtixZ56QXCImiIDWLb2z4LeG28axSPEk/8lK9+zj HYcQuKGS2wJo8oxZRUrbHH39hXcwGG4n+VVXWehF76KmJ3zYyZ67f3FQlBnFsHj/1iQt Tqhuz/0tQAQoMmg6Cs7nG7qhGd1cfnAO5M6JbP1C1BGp1V+i9YGKqMELphLcj+hKmbau 0GVZFWSqnI0lVSAm7bUUhHZVwB24IK0surcx8yKhtJoEfyDZl6NqhPNYwlu8bxVmvehP 4Dzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=2IO6FaKKU5JWVUJgXFC4ZKdFJbya1lL0RBo5le0KBFQ=; b=sezc+h1tHbV0cb7/YVfffVIRKIDcP4GTMwcXoH16rEFbleT30DtW4kPlqJyeRE+ppd 1zQaDRUys31/ZkIhkaI/lfBn2VNrT0fqjdxRxK/a1AyqBIS/zPziPPn4rvioJOfr7xOi STde1jjjUZhTeRftb4PkyBJvIF/mWN6tQ4Dacgn+uhbQ+lqD0hLUfuCkAn++KnQ6+6C4 2fzTABgLpi2JrT1RlxcCTORM0U/X0wlKgZlFQx8InNEYzo8WbuT2aM0MXGDPKWB81Ukq yo5bYuWrpZUUZxQWv/CKJlG4UjtpozCg9jT5XZ4qe1UBbKi+ZM8vLBuDYYJnW2VNEbac sAOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWtORubBiaOWvCj2u5kuQyYxbq8pYTpzs71T7/XSMLsj42a/oof rHZVZD0gW1TMB3V6DhnNGZ5xuw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqye4s+hpUHxOPYOvLoJgDrr8ohXizHioYVB60qdFQ/6BOhIICf/W974fnXoftFJkETAkK66XA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4794:: with SMTP id u142mr3951045qka.265.1568727273245; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.46] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l7sm1199779qke.67.2019.09.17.06.34.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <1A546022-2A60-4523-8522-C19D013B2168@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_179E8EBE-1391-4E8B-A880-CC6F86D25779"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3578.1\))
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:34:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <b6f0b4ad-af5e-ca65-1c5e-de4465959891@gmail.com>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <ac988227-162c-2af1-98a8-aecde8d1bb68@gmail.com> <449C0C62-C642-4FF6-97E6-27144BA3F760@fugue.com> <b6f0b4ad-af5e-ca65-1c5e-de4465959891@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3578.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/7Lh6JU1DkCQmInwrZk3EMvBNf8Y>
Subject: Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:34:36 -0000
On Sep 17, 2019, at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. As I do not author the draft, and my colleague is not subscribed to this list, I paste here his reply to your question: > >> It is not really clear if the draft is appropriate to the homenet wg. >> One can state that this draft presents a tool/solution (service yang >> model) for orchestator to manage the different uCPE equipment. uCPE >> eqipment is not regular cpe/homenet device. >> uCPE is a host that hosts guest OSs. uCPE is like PC with virtualbox >> where the VMs are running (VMs such as homenet router,cisco router, >> firewall, SD-WAN.) Thanks. The question I would ask here is, is it intended that this uCPE integrate into a multi-subnet, multi-homed homenet?
- [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-ops… Ted Lemon