IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] homenet naming drafts "terminology"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 05 May 2021 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2952B3A1A87 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 10:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nfWmwY9qci_6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 10:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629BF3A1A83 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 May 2021 10:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id l129so2358022qke.8 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5ZZyxtkt0brT6Sul7BZELj7j/tRcdNg4riNoiHu8Wu4=; b=Wh7c4en1/8MBDBEb0f7EIvz7EGGP+bWqyvK4/+TlZL+tfKzZbMsr4xzB/FbREDRVUy iy9EvZw5QiOW/3PxkguI/+GfHPMMj0cnqbCoK97RMSCmiY24T4Zeh2y8pthqeDUNbZph fONNzwrvfjhMMcPlTqwD9+DNz+qFmrJQJreYSZ+7KdYaj91Hx0yr46FdDLTOdfNBWlL2 FBMokGP3ykKX3PLnvtV1XnxkqaalJTb2zO5vp9epXdRf1+NRAtDulYGpzqZU6cnBB8JK +Uv8/2ioiOHLtugVfJbB9DrH+Ec1IF8E7auseG5vSBbMi371ARfp1krWZe3PwLEUkGMl k/6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5ZZyxtkt0brT6Sul7BZELj7j/tRcdNg4riNoiHu8Wu4=; b=nPHQ/kuqITd4XNNYYohRDlxt2zQK0osSIjngk/qA2Em5sAqUbehbw+TdJzG3a4gZkJ WW3pScksQHqjI7ifPgRZcg1ymaKpnjRBvVfSX8ckkiv4kaNbrjjnzKMGvaRyTx8+OCJF 4mgpIgl1p7G6+TuPijHAAQ4Sa5oVHxMuLVAKnPsHxyIcZx+Ab2ua52WyIJg52DQDqz/Y upQZrN48A5z0MJlXVsMdoKpnNhgLdWf7aKg7ZG27Fdbt/jynB+YRdR+gNl80+gdo0k0J 8s4cU7Paus3ZsHWGAI9h5SMdLyA4Wuz2IMYM4G4XDlSV4StAzsUiizdXBNMnwqr76FDq gztw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HzL92MclR5NsSGGYBV9Wl5EXc4c8UsCiepkRTrbgWaRFpE/KX KPgOgWiBJD8i07cklLFDRfPwpg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3CVBHPhNTh4b7eW24RZWLZBW51/8wkeB1uBBRrIkX0RYoMG/dkAd3iOLYQcJwxe07tyotHA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b702:: with SMTP id h2mr30971065qkf.88.1620236872266; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h19sm4483238qkj.33.2021.05.05.10.47.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 May 2021 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <A71FED45-24FC-4630-A002-319C4660F990@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3E641750-3D96-43B4-91C8-9C670D61AFE8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 13:47:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <10381.1620229876@localhost>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
References: <DM6PR02MB69244199F0682769F3332405C3599@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <10381.1620229876@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/7XQTmPFpKvuFCH0OhxR6WvBKD0w>
Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet naming drafts "terminology"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:48:01 -0000

On May 5, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 3) We would be happy to go with another term, but we don't want to invent
>   another term.  So, if the DNS anycast operator has another term, then
>   I'd go with it.

Authority database?

RFC 8499 appears to have deprecated the term “master” to some extent, although it’s not perfect. “Master server” just says “see Primary Server.”

The server on the home router really is the primary authoritative server for the zone from a DNS perspective, even if it doesn’t show up in a public NS record.

FWIW I fully support using different terminology.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email