Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C4B12D4FE for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ua6oxcuc7dsb for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FCA412D4FC for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y84so55867086lfc.0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oIfvYqpZm9i4sIOXOatGJ+S6RmHBZdaEBBlkQC0oaAg=; b=ZCVv/OmyKMNZeTua8V4jyBL6axLyYVFaMf2sRkTk1PZ1VZXmHjoDhoXi65X76EvoAu Y3rNYnJqWBH64vhyGL7JTJbbb6kqskHRQPn3YAyIs/jWN5GsGvh8z3f1KNsMGMVYDgJQ umEynRQECA4dfzEX+s7tJT6pHUP7oLQROGhS1t8YPJjgbXfKk9yyCuo1rLfuFJL9jnL3 FhNb2riw2lAStMwKolybKYUh+s0STPYCgStnO019QA/E40zIbgL+6Lcd9TxaB5JxN+LR xJNBElrAdpp0/BGgRIeUGn8FB1kmLYfb4JqSMpTpGJXiPGN6LIP401CE5uoHQ9Omtlss +rGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oIfvYqpZm9i4sIOXOatGJ+S6RmHBZdaEBBlkQC0oaAg=; b=gGWd/X6/zoCVnWgn+U62+lb/nCL8Twzkg5Akj1yeXl+8ieNWsVOAwB6e/BmmWJY+FN fpKGWXlXwmJuuMUSBPuOEujrAm/k9jnoKHJjCMtAmP7y+ycFDqwvomc8pfyqYi4AGOkc g+guu/Ebc++MFQPvr2cC8WupyBN0mY6wibd9MV7ipNfhXryzs1a0+fpcsSeUh5UUbViO 8eGUpNLUwu2uuTE+9POizcJqz+CfEE6PwhYbvbH+TS0wWypmoWVX0CnpPtux41nJFDFe NmEwZUwYS2EB1bOCpjYKm4+C0+VKl+3UBXk0vpKH4TKV5W+g1qAbpAhQOrVUD92ztfaG QSGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXN06FxatZc02JOsCxKaQe5wqsBEAllCCz+0NWQrHVMt0/D9qSeQV3xbbwO73Ed+hm/aqECf+jwEI6q0w==
X-Received: by 10.25.79.132 with SMTP id d126mr2025256lfb.119.1462984688714; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87mvnwh81u.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <6E709688-414A-4AFB-AEAE-56BAE0469583@coote.org> <87oa93vz8e.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <917CFE11-2386-4B0D-8A81-F87764AC09A4@coote.org> <87lh47vtpe.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <02CF43FB-CF81-4C0C-84E1-A8DFB27B3F8C@coote.org> <87lh44fff7.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <48A9C52C-85BC-4123-A3ED-FB269AD03126@iki.fi> <87eg9wfctc.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nq1CTMmQHFQXnaFY73SyRPKpWagiMVfrHODakbeT2Wxw@mail.gmail.com> <87a8kj3r7p.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1nN+ih8xpBV_-T_JaGtbBG6d5zYqW==tph8yN_UB34NNw@mail.gmail.com> <56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|87dc38b1e390496e02166dafe2490d8as44D0U03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|56DB4264-1769-443A-86F2-BB0BE0ED9693@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <57333B3F.7000009@globis.net> <CC759790-4F9B-47B8-A42C-A85F78AC9773@jisc.ac.uk> <57335AB6.8060305@globis.net> <87mvnwh81u.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:37:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nu98pXdDzVgZ2yW7xe8mwA=O+zmoGS8XLs_NLbNUaKFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114251aaaedaa8053293aad7
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/7vEGeTSzHdLpcgP06BqRK65VAqI>
Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "Ray Hunter \(v6ops\)" <v6ops@globis.net>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updating DNS [was: How many people have installed the homenet code?]
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 16:38:13 -0000

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <
jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>; wrote:

> > I don't like the hybrid proxy model either.  It promises the union of
> > the problems and intersection of the functionality.  Proxying flies in
> > the face of the trend of smart devices and dumb networks.
>
> Very well put.
>

Be that as it may, Homenet in general flies in the face of that trend.
And if you think about it, that trend isn't really a very smart trend,
because the burden it places on devices is extreme, and not all devices
have infinite resources to spend mapping the network and figuring out how
to publish their services on it.