Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AA31200CD for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xtGCqo3VxqP for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE66120096 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x97DjXqe041730; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:45:33 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D777220754D; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:45:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F0020717B; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:45:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x97DjXKN028545; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:45:33 +0200
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
References: <56255ECF-9002-4440-BA0D-665EFC4BA9C6@fugue.com> <173c6dc4-b3de-b85c-1cd7-7a1ea254f7f8@gmail.com> <E04F6C5E-230A-46B5-97EB-6CC071F3D38F@fugue.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c4149bce-4ba6-caae-d048-65ae785999b6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:45:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E04F6C5E-230A-46B5-97EB-6CC071F3D38F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/8zCvK9t03Vuqzr8n7gXQxGuVF2c>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:45:38 -0000


Le 07/10/2019 à 15:25, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:33 AM, Alexandre Petrescu 
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> If somebody makes a good solution and easily deployed for the topology
>> in the above figure, then I am willing to consider it for vehicular
>> networks as well.  In them, the CE Router is a Mobile Router in the car
>> and the Internal Router is one of many other routers in the car.  The
>> ISP is a cellular network and, potentially, an 802.11-OCB network.
> 
> Would ULAs work for your use case, or do you need routing to the 
> Internet from the leaf network?

ULAs without Internet and ULAs with NAT work in some use-cases for 
vehicular networks, but block some of them.

There are several applications that are simple request response and that 
need to work while being initiated from any direction, not just one of 
the two.

One car must be able to query another car for its position and speed to 
get make platooning work without radars/lidars/cameras.  In this, 
Internet is not needed.  ('Internet' means the fixed IP infrastructure).

One traffic light must be able to upload its status to Poste de Control, 
via the Internet, but also one car must be able to query the traffic 
light for its status without going to Poste de Control, via the Internet.

Alex

>