IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4064120096 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sD0Ih4faivnn for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC2212008F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id k9so11611658oib.7 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=plFNE9tEcEMFowyuF6qgp5AHUK8thKg5/jTSVjE+tjY=; b=UfcXOVFf/XDYqELJGC6pZjhzF//OLyQ7ZJl6FgaA2LFwmWlhGMWnfz86equ8h3Nhl/ 6WPvEgptneNLGJoBLx4dKwiqpiMvawGJVxIKwffH9w/bfO58nkDHwPEi/UANC+lvVIDr Q1cYGCcugTYmY9H3c7y/wY0B0rq+e1xcPLX0tzK4jvENUA+/RBSYxAFdaYVgyLZfrESs IupJm/k86ZA2jY+zunMeUEy05DdTHNcT5dAVMOGvyWpdKbNKfFaWauyHP9cbzQMkSOit 9c0g8Lk+S0WZFqM6IG8Ntm3/gdFRs+pfQ+8ZDYDgCqZmilVxb7C8pFKCd5TPvep/vroz m33Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=plFNE9tEcEMFowyuF6qgp5AHUK8thKg5/jTSVjE+tjY=; b=aHYSb/Ss6sgQvLSxTY1bxEehyUXvvDYMRGXKtOJz8yqlc8aLrtg/4RwKXyLSQXYpuA Hq3gpwPe3DlLxNSNPFe+EzPaDU4pSCRcQVfRARE+Aun2FOrfBBdfFl86hJ0oPRPcijyM R3B6eb8EX9h1kLdYdX6qMgdjQRDIoR7UmEODp3XK18+wm50mcjFI6w0blvGitgx6aB82 lty9dELjInb3s4apM4Nrz8hA8HxbO24wdqzPxwI30Ye+UDWDHOprMNJO7aGKDgP156jy eGBmj1SP7tiBRv+WOhsBzqztnsPqDLhxg+keapy4jt06+2XMymZFLj2AgZzp/NAA0aQE ZY/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUyxPSmmx98f9qblXtLU+sm5S2l5O/UmSgWsaFfApO37XlZ+Uh3 yzSTu65zjTLOZaP36Avo0A6eEQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDfMLTaBIceDpe99tFCMgGlsd0FY8n3qznDkyFfsXeNM2aJtTeHa56s3zTh0ug6saWAEtdeQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:7509:: with SMTP id q9mr17067922oic.111.1570454835052; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.254.144.120] (072-182-058-035.res.spectrum.com. [72.182.58.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm4711458oiy.45.2019.10.07.06.27.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <AF4ECDF2-FD9D-4178-BDF1-A3C87A4D1DBE@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DB4A4EBC-EEF3-4183-9884-851EAF88713C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3600\))
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:27:13 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA2AA8FF-3BC4-4359-A718-93F1FCFAE8DA@cisco.com>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Markus Stenberg <homenet@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
References: <FF34E138-469F-40F6-BA8F-7AE02F878B29@employees.org> <CA2AA8FF-3BC4-4359-A718-93F1FCFAE8DA@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3600)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Acq4xOURqjc1mlW040zL3gk7-mA>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:27:17 -0000

On Oct 7, 2019, at 3:37 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> Too bad then... I still fail to see why the model cannot be generalized to more powerful nodes.

Because it is maximally complex?   :]

You say that RPL has scaled to millions of nodes.   Where is this deployed in production?   What are the leaf nodes doing?   With what are they communicating?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email