IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] [Snac] summary of Gateway 2 Gateway side meeting

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 09 August 2022 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB99CC14F72D for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 19:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0mUryM1BDHL for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 19:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAE98C14F730 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 19:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id w196so7331513oiw.10 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 19:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=DAHpF/hsxsspIqnCVYO30T622jao5+sVWkzMG/NALs4=; b=4yvVptZc2FXuwITZHYm34vGvSezrlUiAXBdIB6JrspwHbAcpDIfEGKAmZnfb67DQ/X kZuWOK2EUQBH9wg7/+vFRfC23QAC6eBGhH/Bp5uUvvuTu8OtRKMD66avvrUcbIBevDHm wOUE/xIpl+rH6aXvYsQQCC0dVYKxTmJm2lEDmnMXgfOxM8lvuiWOIVdaceKru9brBKdv SkN/y78UDL+uWIxlj2RkwkdAkY924l5HyiPZJCCDHWJYw7w/SPGgAXo2OvJ4e9ooWudk RmfYfus4/vyY+5P5EFrgR653NyFXj03e6jxk56+CBqoOhauiRzMbixRTcTy890hhbTMl S3jg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=DAHpF/hsxsspIqnCVYO30T622jao5+sVWkzMG/NALs4=; b=E3ZixXR+6yfHVvKJc/FoRoDfkmxJYvddXbQDyNqq38VyddNheUHLcuxAfyeQZhfvmk W2NravkaOTXioh7VxdqshwrUALsFn2aStVQGAajM2CigA9c/6cHUjUzTW3rfl0sj35vk mZwrbCLTWaSX9gkJyTaE2vsq2hN0K9dTMBysMkP63XxLDWh5eAIF2x1X62lHCrbzfaJq 4FiLCcBcyw0+DGz/UX9idzLgg/T+tqi2g5uNkAr8gQmSKHh1mU7LHGy5o+aYqLxqOIdE vZY22yrAeV02wHSYXkBK9DMoD3pPkriA1bHuNraVe97w7woHNungS/6S33sPBkX9FmA/ 1mQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2JZYovKgyaN62Cn6Y5wKVEdq8RaxqtocoNk7NGGbjefzlZPJZC dcrn7XvlbIe5aJwpmRMXC/9fu/6sBbSgLdAPGHe8rQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7iZjFNuRd2zkEosPdWrs2jjQQdBsLMg5IROE8Ufo0q32TtDxBDlBCrqolddU5pMW0rqYpN9VFWpjsi8ypyZnU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1395:b0:33a:79c0:3128 with SMTP id c21-20020a056808139500b0033a79c03128mr8785772oiw.209.1660010817315; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 19:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8183.1659992388@localhost> <824D01E2-25BC-470F-945F-9D64A299F2EE@viagenie.ca> <906.1660010046@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <906.1660010046@localhost>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 22:06:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kr8grEpvj9NA_8dCU_58TY944AZ+wVYkDO4EhzLuDBjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, homenet@ietf.org, snac@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000016fd1905e5c563eb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/B8smt8TFCPwaB_-Cz-NSKpTutJs>
Subject: Re: [homenet] [Snac] summary of Gateway 2 Gateway side meeting
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 02:07:02 -0000

Makes sense. Interesting topic, but significantly different. Might converge
at some point, but not now.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 21:54 Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>     >> Also, because ICN does not involve making active (in the TCP sense)
>     >> connections to the sensors, it means that there is no inherent trust
>     >> that must be created in the sensors in order for them to
> communicate:
>     >> they simply announce their state and allow the network to do its
>     >> thing.
>
>     > I’m getting concerned that we are trying to boil the ocean. We should
>     > reduce the scope of this work to what is achievable. The proponents
>     > seemed to suggest a more narrow use case.
>
> I think that I should have also reported that nobody in the side meeting
> through that it belonged as part of the SNAC work.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email