IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] [Anima] Homenet feedback on the ANIMA charter

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 09 October 2014 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69AC1ACD16; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xM6p5vFAyhu6; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B7A1ACD10; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=23973; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1412848451; x=1414058051; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=P3f2DlDBCQMqC+mDzEiwC/++uMeFa7DhJ/ylaJN0/Lk=; b=QJr6wYuEta7WS3Bhu+vUxJLLKvzCB3qNhRRXAZTzZx8LRr9LxteO/DJu 8z5lIeGnNlrMAAYrZxculE5XK8MeldlWPUmb5psH5B8r10UkMuybyYXwz c40RqPParWRJ9yr2uBg6rCt1Bp1Lk1t3c9gzr+m5R9iH9HZMpi+8iYfsj A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiAFAI1aNlStJssW/2dsb2JhbABfgkiBcYhhygICgR0Be4QEAQEELUsBEAsYCRYBAQ0JAwIBAgFFBgEMAQcBAReII8YHAReQRAeESwEEj12NaIEuhjY7jW6DZTsvgkoBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,683,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="205516826"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2014 09:54:09 +0000
Received: from [10.82.237.37] (rtp-vpn5-1312.cisco.com [10.82.237.37]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s999s743030418; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:54:08 GMT
Message-ID: <54365B3F.5070304@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:54:07 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Laurent Ciavaglia <Laurent.Ciavaglia@alcatel-lucent.com>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
References: <542BFFAE.1080105@cisco.com> <CD1269E0-96B5-4A1A-8C1C-93DAB44068D4@iki.fi> <542D422F.1090302@cisco.com> <542D4BAB.2060009@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <542D4BAB.2060009@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020600080702020401090903"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/BE9wpDRTxqZVBMmHp94nSQVsPMg
Cc: homenet@ietf.org, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] [Anima] Homenet feedback on the ANIMA charter
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:54:14 -0000

On 02/10/2014 14:57, Laurent Ciavaglia wrote:
> Dear Benoit, Markus, all,
>
> On 02/10/2014 14:16, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> On 01/10/2014 18:27, Markus Stenberg wrote:
>>
>>> Notably, adoption of a solution (discovery+negotiation protocol) before adoption of use cases seems like putting cart before the horse.
>> Valid point.
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>
> Indeed a valid point, however before concluding here, some insights 
> might help:
>     -OPS ADs gave guidance to focus on (applicability on) 2 use cases 
> only.
>     -The solution adoption milestone shall read as _applicability_ of 
> the protocols onto the two proposed/elected use cases (the milestone 
> should be rewritten in that sense for more clarity).
>     -The WG aims at developing protocols reusable _among __multiple_ 
> use cases.
>     -An initial step of the WG should be to extract, from these 
> multiple use cases, the boundaries / problems these protocols have to 
> solve.
The charter has been updated to reflect this.

Regards, Benoit
>
>
> HTH, best regards, Laurent.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email