Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?

Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> Tue, 26 April 2016 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468F912D177 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5Pj-Jikh1D6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F9B12D174 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id d90so4052538qgd.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QLGdbUYosZBv93gtbUd4xKkR6hAYL2VKz69iz0peD7w=; b=dyZBtfOI6BnkjA9TLHnJGUXTwwY3kTSed7Lf1EZdJFfrsR3mkLK/A6mN+L3mPL8Kvq 6PJawVr6jBAmHgpvsqqZr79cvT04wd261T05I4zv95FYqd8/X437MHHDK3rCwQjzrHzF w/Lm5k/xfIpQJ3RgQbKJ6SnvIYZerIO2hRB983ZLjIqQ92THtpHNHzaiiaYs91GjAGv9 27lorBwz0V2QF//Q06pRarDlyC4LSVDKjDCjU7OQV6RJf6HkY/vKmB3zaMh4wwi0N7c7 MTxV1RLTLM7mnF3UtVgpYJbsDtlOKOKpjD91l87rh6dtuq1XxiKIhN7gRONAb8xfTa+n lZNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QLGdbUYosZBv93gtbUd4xKkR6hAYL2VKz69iz0peD7w=; b=i+CgbEwLPP6UxFnsNadhRBXZL3EElnTHyQtNt6b7mndgS3imy4x/3n5sYrRCILqL+E CPcwSPaX1oPmjaTPEkiA1Apu5Ovy5pTtCVwP7IAbfbTbbt+mYAoFYLuZbyN/yQ8KcBuE 4Rr5VRdkIsIH52esbGdABGaYtLLAWwuKgxvaWx8bKA7IO53MWtzOO5adsmBYExl1rw/9 TeznAM8f4ZRBvYiS/q7QU3GBM43voJnf/tB41L2GJExwZNCPPf1baXH+uE941KjmUasi bq9ISyoxpPiipXn6DTrdCdcvCsIT+SAM7g4ASzX5lnNLTIcLWeQketpRGX7bwbdBls97 jexA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXo0NEHxVoL3/+OYln3a377oOO+0o6Kgiqu6TelGy4SZnGLNkYCQGPqg/fNE8axNQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.179.76 with SMTP id z73mr1888273qhz.36.1461672551217; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from richs-mbp-1871.lan (pool-64-223-172-43.man.east.myfairpoint.net. [64.223.172.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q184sm8003472qhe.24.2016.04.26.05.09.09 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160425141017.1572996e@envy.e5.y.home>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:09:09 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A37F9040-70EE-4C71-BCCB-1D043EFFF65E@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.76.1461438011.7526.homenet@ietf.org> <30D7858D-4589-4C32-BD96-1BDB06BA56FB@gmail.com> <20160425141017.1572996e@envy.e5.y.home>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/BH8tuWJVNmWtWAHObzV7BYgZEGo>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:09:14 -0000

Thanks for this info. I have two primary interests here.

1) I would like to stop farbling around with configuring subnets in my home. :-)

2) With that knowledge in hand, I'll update the OpenWrt wiki, and include a procedure for getting the developer feed if necessary.

This all sounds pretty straightforward - and that the CC build is a good place to start. Thanks again!

Rich

> On Apr 25, 2016, at 8:10 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>; wrote:
> 
> * Rich Brown
> 
>> I'm new to this list, but have been using CeroWrt and OpenWrt for
>> several years.
> 
> Welcome!
> 
>> Earlier in this thread there was a mention about hnetd being well
>> integrated into the OpenWrt ecosystem. Before I try installing hnetd,
>> I would like to know:
>> 
>> 1) What are the current recommendations for hnetd in OpenWrt? Barrier
>> Breaker? Chaos Calmer? Trunk? Are there settings/bugs/etc. to be
>> aware of?
> 
> Speaking only for myself, I'm using Chaos Calmer but backport newer
> Homenet-related packages to ensure that I am up to date with the latest
> bugs / bug fixes. I could publish my custom feed to Github in case
> you're interested.
> 
> As for known bugs and issues, I'd check out the issues reported to
> Steven's repositories:
> 
> https://github.com/sbyx/hnetd/issues
> https://github.com/sbyx/odhcpd/issues
> https://github.com/sbyx/ohybridproxy/issues
> 
> That said, think what's in CC works well enough for most uses, although
> I've had issues with mdnsd causing out-of-memory crashes. That could be
> because my old routers are underpowered, but then again I haven't seen
> it since upgrading to the latest version available in the devel feed.
> 
> Tore