IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-15.txt

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Tue, 25 May 2021 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D45D3A1126 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WH4aFKrHemy for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C483A1119 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:1]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 14PCMcIM014136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:38 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay2/82085) with ESMTP id 14PCMbOE004391; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:37 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25C7BDEBF; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id te77ev5I3sPM; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5B9FBDEB8; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87y2c3uho4.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <b6aaa622-bb36-9cb7-0e1a-b2cd40500cec@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <162092926151.12926.11178130729299739728@ietfa.amsl.com> <b6aaa622-bb36-9cb7-0e1a-b2cd40500cec@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/28.0 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]); Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.141]); Tue, 25 May 2021 14:22:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 60ACEC0E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-Miltered: at potemkin with ID 60ACEC0D.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 60ACEC0E.000 from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/null/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 60ACEC0D.002 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 60ACEC0E.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 60ACEC0D.002 on potemkin.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/BhWIw2z7FxnfCXQaymDRdpsOvhA>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-15.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:22:49 -0000

> #5 The arguments why this is better than DDNS don't convince
> me, except for the last one (new RR types).  Given that DDNS is
> deployed, what's the chances that this would also get traction?

I think that's an important point.  I actually asked the very same
question back in 2014:

  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/CBoLV2St-kSW0vQNE4GtKqRQthA/
  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/m3tmE8m1pt11YIB5yAtWUMFlv3c/

The authors integrated the discussion as Section 1.2 of the draft, which
is what you are referring to.  I'm not sure if I'm convinced by their
arguments, I suspect that there's some unstated requirement that I don't
undestand.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email