IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Introduction to draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 26 May 2018 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968E312E88F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 20:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBt5yz2FqTj4 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 20:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x233.google.com (mail-ot0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC23127871 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 20:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t1-v6so8159495oth.8 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 20:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=tfwbPkOj9SvH06rXz0A2JJ2gGxz7/IzMZk6pT1DgC+E=; b=ALJVLOPgQyWQWNGOS9F9ZT0l1U7ec4t4QOnIpplwjFjCiQYJdnMs8FH1XFNKVGXIrT 1vmLXh+TIKOHTYPJt4Q8OVN8DD+EaT48ktqlTqATqPwMmrxC4TqfBUPjBfNoyZ0xPkRo iGOkOAM9pjxJDX/Koz04l1Ln9u52+KEs4JPsbj7Ao2UclYmaZkcfAbOqYOva+BKbiFlW ECeFzsVt+M4ZfuIY8hkjDz9m/ogW4KbdrfODzBqSjI1iv87zT69FqNzfguPI9U7xvN80 AZbm+zAFWM9VWSZmPxBnUNAjnDhrId+dgMt/BtI6ssG+qwHpsieRoM5IgTBVyuV7Qimx KVBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=tfwbPkOj9SvH06rXz0A2JJ2gGxz7/IzMZk6pT1DgC+E=; b=aX9W7nmUL2RxH2wUDYPqrKr9lpj41/D4ccZ7ivEmjG+hGOJrV+bSeIIRF3Zw/aRBir ivjg8sTUjg7OG/CJrvpoCmLnQSYAGm5U9a2AwVeAX7Zr8ptIo/sPrlYVDUIq9wzj3nSd 9hv+7Q+HVq0w0t9wyQHsjBd2XSgzvCC1sbdublkj+rtO7FIJfMdSp+2547LLqWTlATIh 212bVojaL21Ld1ruu7k4sGSaPhyNCrtJ2urqea/l+n/44fCMcC40ez0/Glc6xViByUCk 6AhROX1bhI9wQdYLgHDGm8hJ+VBXyZDsPgXFXqfFV4Lomw1ug+JiG0+KP6DoUudUv7fl BC1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwe33I3zt9jUEmSer/jbO8Wd14b7+OTqmyV+QW2/4D8Jo9cid0N6 PQGYkPWKtP1iuCluYN3GyFgdDg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKBALsRwDXAyuTtQE8ZZ0m8t3vXIECnlXuGDB61ow/75HhnZLCenbYYarwnhEGn41MZhy283w==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4881:: with SMTP id d1-v6mr3320020otf.353.1527304724100; Fri, 25 May 2018 20:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (47-215-236-167.sdoncmtk01.res.dyn.suddenlink.net. [47.215.236.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14-v6sm14108932oth.15.2018.05.25.20.18.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 May 2018 20:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <88C40890-5549-448D-AD9E-3AFAB96F0D5C@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F08181B3-85E9-418B-8D49-F065D07B09E2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 20:18:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <90ef1a9a-3625-3b7f-81ca-d6d51e706637@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <CAPt1N1kcuDBxK1=RN=_Q4YM7L_-YDNaEt4WS-sh2YDeJgvMgRw@mail.gmail.com> <29946.1527267593@localhost> <1D99A968-513F-47D4-A208-9D401E58415A@fugue.com> <10396.1527278777@localhost> <c8240cb6-3bb7-9b18-0352-1f448fe8a617@gmail.com> <68ECF5F3-F0EC-438E-ABFD-292A5982D2F7@fugue.com> <90ef1a9a-3625-3b7f-81ca-d6d51e706637@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/CDFcJDjh8aYexy0_tkCkUW8Luk0>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Introduction to draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 03:18:47 -0000

On May 25, 2018, at 7:18 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Understood. However, many of us exposed to certain operating systems deeply hate it when the system thinks it knows what we want better than we do. What I'm suggesting is that dealing with unexpected and/or faulty human intervention is also necessary. So IMHO human override needs to be thought about, both as a risk and as a feature.

Yes, for sure.   But e.g. one of the things homenets do right is to deal with humans plugging and unplugging indiscriminately.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email