IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-dot-10.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 01 August 2017 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB981322AF for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cs7C7sVOf1Nm for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4AB1322A1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p3so14472735qtg.2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=kA8k7pdDIseXVJoOC3tEAmhQxINBQirYW+OvezSwcVQ=; b=SwO15gOHECM0k9huHnd/Hh1gOyc1994AXPgD4/MbtCwk9/K9fD6NZC9yx2kBYza+Py lKspT4ubGb4INqMt1w+RVYmdoaR/R2qzxOOEJG3x7vOBs6kVRFm8A8uavhRLYnxve7Lv 1XsS6nTkLz8XEKA0Nn4tCwT/lUdIKbgVUS0DBW3lEKf3pL/xyOLN6D7f8hgntetnw48p QIbxSizvRPhGIdbrM6avyjFBnoF5Npxt3tRW0hsswFj52xwaLUq9gNC5KqDIn0/AqiL1 r0x+nqEPWco4YqwXTsgwwPjB7/ZC8rj/ok3GH3E78k0tZ/4xOAWoPUkN0b9HwX4y/yxT Rt+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=kA8k7pdDIseXVJoOC3tEAmhQxINBQirYW+OvezSwcVQ=; b=iC3B5+od4wRP2Gr5OfzEkQQrh8Zw9MyrXPR8fwDJ9oYKKnR9ZPAu7szjTnDTMW8eBg Mmx00rscv7MkaCssrh3qU5JjKGMz93VE7QV1BDv1IH1O3YkcXtl4Vi66Y3ktzeJnAtL1 brqaAH7KIlytZEQFKu4sxd991iuvg0pNqDPH25V41hA4q9Q+KzDQ/I/dsVRiD9j01ddB 1C48Mr9RRCiDM47MP5yRCtpbcSjuaeKjbgS5v0qqX9bYQhTE2Hi3Ko8zOAMYyIcq92ZU 3xcR+jCG/XL/OBgFcLxytrIsjzlwhyE+GEftQSoJv9CtUKWzpssVRVlC03lNFyd5TWYa 08bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1102KJ5Q7n3tLrudswBGtd29lOww647NYJ0EJwdWTQijaQqTIiIR jj8UNdoxEiEbITGi
X-Received: by 10.237.63.67 with SMTP id q3mr30246381qtf.280.1501613469008; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g206sm11142464qkb.13.2017.08.01.11.51.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <7AFC1987-B964-47FC-8485-9AA561752E78@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DAFDC193-34F7-4E1A-BB86-77573ED162E3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 14:51:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <7ibmnzxhgk.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
References: <150127266271.25329.18484770769960144@ietfa.amsl.com> <597F7545.9000702@mathemainzel.info> <E51998F5-8EF9-4FC8-90BE-1D0BF1805339@fugue.com> <b562a9fd0ce2d8af63109aac47d1d47a.1501567308@squirrel.mail> <757C1755-AD78-43DE-93F0-E3D19BFE6C66@fugue.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBE4251@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <3A5D69EE-3F32-4773-90ED-D189E7523D9F@fugue.com> <7ilgn3xkfe.wl-jch@irif.fr> <E4DA3327-CACA-40B1-828D-6335B57B25C1@fugue.com> <7ibmnzxhgk.wl-jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/CSdV4Pa4c2v6sRyYpsBqjSbE7lo>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-dot-10.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 18:51:14 -0000

On Aug 1, 2017, at 2:37 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> Think of it as a knob with a wasps' nest behind it.

I know how to build it, so no, I don't think of it that way.   I can think much worse wasp's nests.   One example would be a network with no trust model that encourages end-users to engage in very risky practices in order simply to use it.   I don't think we can fully mitigate that problem, but I think it's worth thinking about what we _can_ do to mitigate it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email