Re: [homenet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dot-13: (with COMMENT)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 31 August 2017 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301CF132D8F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sUURRVtR2Tdp for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45E0132DF9 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id u11so3432261qtu.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vuNek2amyfDCG3dO850LPaa5vs7QAS3M00JE9Q9H8Ts=; b=p8bKgOjjIPF9TqajBeGCyi57YuV1gK7IlH0WFAiWojEbOXOAtLBSSR5nY3Gv9RfF50 c/wgxm4IO9gZqahriJpWB1TsBGrcMapix9lOqxJnZunQg+S8XURJfhfeS78ei4vGbwUZ tVG4BowDl3ZwBrPZXwYcgKQexx7fyuhUzNVsN6A7aDw989J8dnzqTyUg8mV05tmXLmcW ciO9fI0RZDN1hhrV3HR/wNB6V7QSlP5vc5pkPnHkdTT16nk6H07lLBBJ7VuA0WGTVNiW lU38CvYqh1vYN16bKwfZ15KnbT1wWCO9LKF0d4gkIXv3+nm5M1HAvlfluGmLa6Yj4OaZ BjaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vuNek2amyfDCG3dO850LPaa5vs7QAS3M00JE9Q9H8Ts=; b=uliPvik1/zh30GpUl0XvPqOUKdtD04iqHVpVMm/mQOu/eziuOQ1tMzxJXhORmP82Eu keTGBDxb9okWZNo9b4ZbnWjZ9e8ESHxsMHxcBkjJbc0WguGD3R46hZ54QmbLLsk8aYOd g/DphA0cUyutRwXcNTO8Ks5gB9GavUrPsK9ojGthqepNVCP/s6qRvgwjCLFk4r29Tm9L x5u6my9r9P235z4qKc5N/ozC6B1vQm2U+m1pQqzmwElHXo7CI/HEmf8X+mgf2pjKxDnu tCBsiP29QpO1yeZRkwh8fvI+p6PMtcOmRu17HpHB+dtCe5bMIOFIfQEhtchx0SlDzESg 7hAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUheb/7D8ePf/yG2uTvzxYU4/2E5R7Imv79tgFiPWad/I+i2DxzZ R4oMdhMMAvkvI+QEF2Rang==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6zWT1RkSmweMgbKqRYpyGT31LZOsCaju/tgqKbaYvt31TetJe0rE9ISOqaHfwpoTjS6K/AhA==
X-Received: by 10.200.38.183 with SMTP id 52mr7010932qto.237.1504188708817; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cavall.ether.lede.home (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n90sm2163712qkl.78.2017.08.31.07.11.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <150418755679.16776.2244408640678371841.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:11:46 -0400
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-homenet-dot@ietf.org, homenet-chairs@ietf.org, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, ray@bellis.me.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FBD5D847-F9F5-4284-B867-8F656EE8070C@fugue.com>
References: <150418755679.16776.2244408640678371841.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/DU6BqkPHN4GaG1IQNFPUsYCd1gM>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dot-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:11:52 -0000

I can update the text as follows:

        As a result,
	the use of '.home.', both as specified in RFC7788, and for other uses is deprecated.
	This should not be taken to mean that an explicit allocation by ICANN is superseded;
	this deprecation refers to uses of '.home.' as practiced at the time of publication
	of this document.

As you can see, though, this is somewhat problematic, which is why we took out similar text previously.   I think this new text is less problematic than the old text, but personally I still prefer to just let people wonder what "deprecated" means.   I would actually rather leave it ambiguous, in the sense that this would also discourage ICANN allocating '.home.' as a GTLD.   However, I suspect that there are people on the IESG who understand this issue better than I do, and so I would appreciate it if you would discuss this during the telechat, if you read this in time, and see if you can get a consensus from the IESG on what to write here.   I am happy to make this change or not make it, as you all decide.

> On Aug 31, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-homenet-dot-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dot/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> "As a result, the use of '.home' is deprecated."
> I had to double-checked that .home was NOT in
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml
> .home was specified/requested in RFC7788 but never requested to IANA according
> to RFC6761. If mentioned in the draft, this info might help others...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet