IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] In-network connectivity and HNCP: IPv6 ULA

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 19 July 2018 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865FF130E98 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ZstIEhqEj67 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E38130DC1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/75695) with ESMTP id w6J2Siku004256; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 04:28:44 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA5DEB22E; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 04:29:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id puzTp0fQZedw; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 04:29:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from trurl.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0323EB200; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 04:29:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 04:29:24 +0200
Message-ID: <871sc0ot4r.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <874lgwotoo.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <87bmb4oy1w.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAPt1N1nz+SAZNjUEFQ1GzmrskWW0DAmh1TNaN1icPsD-YPd69g@mail.gmail.com> <874lgwotoo.wl-jch@irif.fr>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 04:28:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5B4FF75C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5B4FF75C.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5B4FF75C.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/EZBy5xDj41W5580mNNaYnIrvuOI>
Subject: Re: [homenet] In-network connectivity and HNCP: IPv6 ULA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 02:29:29 -0000

>> But if we want homenet to be widely adopted, I do not think this is the
>> correct default behavior: it violates the principle of least surprise.

> There's no surprise, it just works.  RFC 6724, Section 6, Rule 8.

Er, no.  ULAs have global scope.  My bad.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email