[homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-10: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 29 September 2015 20:46 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150929204649.4804.89631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:46:49 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/EfjfaHd9BPPe1kRaMOX2eQwTFdk>
Cc: homenet-chairs@ietf.org, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp@ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-homenet-dncp.ad@ietf.org
Subject: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-10: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dncp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the new appendix B. How should we interpret the "(optional)"
tag on some of the sections of that appendix? For example, does for the
Transport Security section, does (optional) mean the section is optional,
that transport security is optional, or both?

[homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell
Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Markus Stenberg
Re: [homenet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell