Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 22 October 2015 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99DE1A1B7B for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJ6_p_gg4Xit for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8008D1A1BD7 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 88687A1; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:27:21 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1445513241; bh=gxakqeitHT0vvEDdEfgEFN72VgL2qP2ebDyWMNiXWms=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OGD+86xdVHb1QxOxkSHaMOeNeOFz2cJ4Yml73YFngR+d51IqIcGpkIANLpE9DE1Zi UhVXXSj8fMVa4bIQuBIud1YvjTayYbMtklaCqsphz7HthWdmgiXnx2obWUsL27+8o1 0w6nQIORNC60csw32BYFqRT0ICzwg4N9i8sjU06s=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812F09F; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:27:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:27:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5Ei_LUUFRwVpjDecMn2wAOA__i2mHo1enW62+sU4LhnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510221302520.16053@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAA93jw5Ei_LUUFRwVpjDecMn2wAOA__i2mHo1enW62+sU4LhnQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/EltPI6rSsN1YyqfifIKV-mQbzxw>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:27:29 -0000

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> is it up from 8?

I have spent 20 hours this week testing the hnet-full(babel) and 
hnet-full(isis) on OpenWRT 15.05 (CC).

There are bugs. Sometimes all IPv4 addresses on the router are just gone 
and won't come back until hnetd is restarted. I talked to the devs, it 
seems to be OpenWRT API related (if I understood correctly). It seems my 
test case to have OpenWRT as Wifi client isn't commonly used... Sometimes 
hnetd seems to lose HNCP-connectivity (and deconfigure addresses) with 
neighbors even though the routing protocol is still up. I have hours of 
video (screen capture), but I'm not sure it'll help debug these issues, 
and they're not easy to trigger, they're intermittent and they don't 
happen because something noticably specific happened.

So I agree, we need more eyes on this!

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se