IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Sat, 21 November 2015 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D471B2AAC for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 11:26:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.15
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6U_EGWJWcQi for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 11:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9453C1B2AAB for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 11:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/56228) with ESMTP id tALJQmKE028361; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:26:48 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4332061FA3; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:26:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 5fbdKB-kuw2n; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:26:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from trurl.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (col75-1-78-194-40-74.fbxo.proxad.net [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA7E361FA1; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:26:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:26:49 +0100
Message-ID: <87vb8vb1c6.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>
In-Reply-To: <564EF0FC.3010107@openwrt.org>
References: <20151119054206.26381.90805.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <564EF0FC.3010107@openwrt.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:26:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5650C578.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5650C578.002 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5650C578.002 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/FYzOtsSr0h7V8E1bFghWLF3qFL0>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 19:26:52 -0000

> It MUST be set to 0 if the router is not capable of doing FOO,
> otherwise it SHOULD be set to 4 but MAY be set to any value from 1 to
> 7 to indicate a non-default priority. The values 8-15 are reserved
> for future use.

Steven, shouldn't it say explicitly what a node does when it receives
a capability in the 8 to 15 range ?  Should it let the router announcing
the out-of-range capability win the election, or should such announcements
be ignored?  (Shncpd does the former, which I guess is the intent.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email